I agree with the given answer because of the gain or loss on retirement of bonds = book value of bonds - the amount paid to the bondholders
I will attached the picture of what you are talking about here. The answer for this problem is: Yes, that they are congruent by SAS. Meaning that the triangles are congruent if their included angles and any pair of corresponding sides are equal in both triangles. In this case, the sides are both 21 cm and this will make the angle equal for both triangles, so that is why they are congruent.
A. (−3, 3)
<span>3x – 4y = 21
</span>3(-3) - 4(3) = 21
-21 = 21 >>>>> not equal
B. (−1, −6)
<span>3(-1) - 4(-6) = 21
</span>21 = 21 >>>>>>>>>>Equal
C. (7, 0)
<span>3(7) - 4(0) = 21
</span>21 = 21>>>>>>>>>>equal
D. (11, 3)
<span>3(11) - 4(3) = 21
</span>21 = 21 >>>>>>>>>equal
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>21, 75 m</em>
<em>Step-by-step explanation:</em>
<em>The actual length ?</em>
<em>14, 5 cm × 150 = 2 175 cm = 21, 75 m</em>
<em />
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that 30% of California residents have adequate earthquake supplies.
a) Ramon variable X denotes the number of the california residents that have adequate earthquake insurance
B) x can take value 1 ,2 ,3 ......
C)The distribution of random variable is geometric distribution with parameter p=0.3
The pmf of geometric distribution is

D)P(X=1) or P(X=2)=P(X=1)+P(X=2)
P(X=1) or P(X=2)=
E)

F)

p is the resident who does not have adequate earthquake supplies.
p = 1-0.3 = 0.7

G)