Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Let m be number of minutes it will take to download the whole game.
We are told that computer is downloading at a rate of 0.01 GB per minute and half GB game is already downloaded. So 0.01*m+0.5 will be equal to 2.2 as game size is 2.2 GB.
Let us find the least number of minutes it will take to download the whole game.



Therefore,
is our desired inequality.
Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
Answer:
4. A) 
3. A) 
2. D) 
1. C) 
Step-by-step explanation:
4. Two families combined have <em>at</em><em> </em><em>least</em><em> </em>3 pets.
3. $1500 is your result, so everything else is straightforward simple, knowing that the keywords <em>at</em><em> </em><em>least</em><em> </em>$1500<em> </em>mean <em>greater</em><em> </em><em>than</em><em> </em><em>or</em><em> </em><em>equal</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em>$1500.
2. Find the correspondents, then determine what inequality to use. In this case, you will use <em>less than</em><em> </em><em>or equal</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em>because overpaying is UNNECESSARY.
1. <em>Eight</em><em> </em><em>dollars</em><em> </em><em>each</em><em> </em><em>pizza</em><em> </em>and <em>twelve</em><em> </em><em>dollars</em><em> </em><em>each</em><em> </em><em>pizza</em><em> </em>is <em>12x</em><em> </em>and <em>8x</em>.<em> </em>The rest is straightforward simple because you now have your <em>initial</em><em> </em><em>costs</em><em> </em>of <em>$</em><em>45</em><em> </em>and <em>$</em><em>5</em>,<em> </em>and the exercise tells you that the total charge for Company A is <em>less than</em> the total charge for Company B, therefore you have your answer.
I am joyous to assist you anytime.
Answer: In the beginning he was given 27 sweets.
Step-by-step explanation: The most logical thing to do is to solve it backwards, that is, from what he had at the end of the third day up till the beginning of the first day.
On the third day he ate one-third and had 8 sweets left over. To determine how many he started with on the third day, let the total on day three be called a. If one-third of a is eaten, then the left over which is two-thirds is 8. That is;
8/a = 2/3
By cross multiplication we now have
8 x 3 = 2a
24/2 = a
a = 12
Let the number of sweets he had on day two be called b. If he ate one-third of b and he had 12 left over, then the two-thirds left over is 12 and we now have;
12/b = 2/3
By cross multiplication we now have
12 x 3 = 2b
36 = 2b
36/2 = b
b = 18
Let the number of sweets he had on day one be called x. If he ate one-third of x and he had 18 left over, then the two-thirds left over is 18, and we now have;
18/x = 2/3
By cross multiplication we now have
18 x 3 = 2x
54 = 2x
x = 27
Therefore Tim was given 27 sweets at the beginning.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
c !!