Answer:
d.There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the quality and price of a car are associated. There were ten cars used in the sample.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
You have two variables X₁: quality score of a car and X₂: the price of a car.
It was analyzed id there is an association between the quality and the price.
The null hypothesis of a Spearman's rank correlation test is:
H₀: There is no association between the quality and the price of cars.
The researcher failed to reject the null hypothesis which means that there is no association between the variables of interest.
The sample size is listed in the output n= 10 consumer reports.
I hope you have a SUPER day!
Question:
You are in a bike race. When you get to the first checkpoint, you are 2/5 of the distance to the second checkpoint. When you get to the second check point, you are 1/4 of the distance to the finish. If the entire race is 40 miles, what is the distance between the start and the first check point?
Answer: 4 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
Let distance between start to first checkpoint = x
First checkpoint to second checkpoint = 2/5 of x
Distance of start to checkpoint 1 = ( 2/5 of start to checkpoint 2)
Distance of start to checkpoint 2 = (1/4 of start to finish)
If start to checkpoint 2 = 1/4 of start to finish
Then,
Distance of start to checkpoint 1 = ( 2/5 * 1/4 of start to finish)
Distance of start to checkpoint 1 = 2/20 of start to finish = 1/10 of start to finish
Entire race = 40 miles = distance from start to finish
1/ 10 of 40
= ( 1/10) × 40
= 4 miles
Answer:
$1340.49
Step-by-step explanation:
From the attached image
Subtotal Cost of Purchased Items
Since the builder receives a 20% contractor's discount, plus and additional 3% for paying in full within 30 days.
Discount = 23% of $1658 = 0.23 X 1658 =$381.34
Total (Less Discount) = 1658-381.34 = $1276.66
Tax on building materials is 5%.
Therefore:
Tax = 5% of $1276.66=0.05 X 1276.66
Tax=$63.83
Therefore, the total bill:
=$1276.66+63.83
Grand Total =$1340.49
Answer:
Jamie should have reversed the inequality when using the division property of inequality.
Step-by-step explanation:
Jamie wrote
500 − 30x ≥ 200
Subtract 500 from both sides
500-500-30x ≥ 200-500
-30x ≥ -300
Divide both sides by -30
x ≥ 10
Instead of reversing the inequality when using the division property of inequality
500 − 30x ≥ 200
Subtract 500 from both sides
500-500-30x ≥ 200-500
-30x ≥ -300
Divide both sides by -30
x <or= 10
