All categories

1 year ago

What is the sum of the distinct prime factors of 315

1 answer:

7 0

Answer: The exponents in the prime factorization are 2, 1, and 1. Adding one to each and multiplying we get (2 + 1)(1 + 1)(1 + 1) = 3 x 2 x 2 = 12. Therefore 315 has exactly 12 factors.

Step-by-step explanation: First, the exponents in the prime factorization are 2, 1, and 1. Then adding one to each and multiplying we get (2 + 1)(1 + 1)(1 + 1) = 3 x 2 x 2 = 12. Finally, 315 has exactly 12 factors.

You might be interested in

Leslie started last week with $1200 in her checking account. During the week, she wrote the checks below.

kifflom [539]

Answer: B
Look at the line where it says 935 54
Leslie goes to the salon and pays $30
$935.54 - $30 = $905.54

However, the line after the $30 says $900.59, which is incorrect.

Hope this helps!

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A line segment has endpoints at (–4, –6) and (–6, 4). Which reflection will produce an image with endpoints at (4, –6) and (6, 4

Natasha2012 [34]

Reflection on the -x axis

7 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

Which equations represent the data in the table? Check all that apply.

kipiarov [429]

Answer:

a,d,e

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A recent study found that 51 children who watched a commercial for Walker Crisps (potato chips) featuring a long-standing sports

hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

The claim is that the mean amount of Walker Crisps eaten was significantly higher for the children who watched the sports celebrity- endorsed Walker Crisps commercial

The kind of test to use is a t -test because a t -test is used to check if there is a difference between means of a population

$t = 3.054$

The p-value is $p-value = P(Z > 3.054) = 0.0011291$

The conclusion is

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean amount of Walker Crisps eaten was significantly higher for the children who watched the sports celebrity- endorsed Walker Crisps commercial

The test statistics is

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The first sample size is $n_1 = 51$

The first sample mean is $\mu_1 = 36$

The second sample size is $n_2 = 41$

The second sample size is $\mu_2 = 25$

The first standard deviation is $\sigma _1 = 21.4 \ g$

The second standard deviation is $\sigma _2 = 12.8 \ g$

The level of significance is $\alpha = 0.05$

The null hypothesis is $H_o : \mu_1 = \mu_ 2$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : \mu_1 > \mu_2$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

$t = \frac{\= x_1 - \= x_2}{ \sqrt{ \frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2} } }$

=> $t = \frac{ 36 - 25}{ \sqrt{ \frac{ 21.4^2}{51} + \frac{ 12.8^2}{41} } }$

=> $t = 3.054$

The p-value is mathematically represented as

$p-value = P(Z > 3.054)$

Generally from the z table

$P(Z > 3.054) = 0.0011291$

=> $p-value = P(Z > 3.054) = 0.0011291$

From the values obtained we see that $p-value < \alpha$ so the null hypothesis is rejected

Thus the conclusion is

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean amount of Walker Crisps eaten was significantly higher for the children who watched the sports celebrity- endorsed Walker Crisps commercial

5 0

2 years ago

The number of cities in a region over time is represented by the function C(x)=2.9(1.05)^x. The approximate number of people per

N76 [4]

Answer:

B. $T(x) = 2.9\cdot (1.05)^{4\cdot x + 5}$