Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

13

The total energy in a system is 675 J. The kinetic energy changes from 296 J to 432 J. Which statement best describes the potent

ial energy of this system?
It changes from 296 J to 432 J.

It changes from 379 J to 243 J.

It changes from 432 J to 296 J.

It changes from 243 J to 379 J.

2 answers:

Elanso [62]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

It changes from 379 J to 243 J.

Explanation:

stich3 [128]2 years ago

5 0

By definition, the Total energy is given by:

$E = U + K$

Where,

U: potential energy

K: kinetic energy

We look for the value of the potential energy for the different values of the kinetic energy.

We have then:

For K = 296:

$U = E - K\\U = 675 - 296\\U = 379$

For K = 432:

$U = E - K\\U = 675 - 432\\U = 243$

Therefore, the change in power power is from 379 J to 243 J

Answer:

It changes from 379 J to 243 J.

You might be interested in

As in the video, we apply a charge +Q to the half-shell that carries the electroscope. This time, we also apply a charge –Q to t

Andreyy89

Answer:

Explanation:

When the positively charged half shell is brought in contact with the electroscope, its needle deflects due to charge present on the shell.

When the negatively charged half shell is brought in contact with the positively charged shell , the positive and negative charge present on each shell neutralises each other .So both the shells lose their charges .The positive half shell also loses all its charges

When we separate the half shells , there will be no deflection in the electroscope because both the shell have already lost their charges and they have become neutral bodies . So they will not be able to produce any deflection in the electroscope.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A uniform sphere with mass M and radius R is rotating with angular speed ω1 about a frictionless axle along a diameter of the sp

liq [111]

Answer:

$W_2=\sqrt{\frac{3}{5} }W_1$

Explanation:

For the first ball, the moment of inertia and the kinetic energy is:

$I_1 =\frac{2}{5}MR^2$

$K_1 = \frac{1}{2}IW_1^2$

So, replacing, we get that:

$K_1 = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{2}{5}MR^2)W_1^2$

At the same way, the moment of inertia and kinetic energy for second ball is:

$I_2 =\frac{2}{3}MR^2$

$K_2 = \frac{1}{2}IW_2^2$

So:

$K_2 = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{2}{3}MR^2)W_2^2$

Then, $K_2$ is equal to $K_1$ , so:

$K_2 = K_1$

$\frac{1}{2}(\frac{2}{3}MR^2)W_2^2 = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{2}{5}MR^2)W_1^2$

$\frac{1}{3}MR^2W_2^2 = \frac{1}{5}MR^2W_1^2$

$\frac{1}{3}W_2^2 = \frac{1}{5}W_1^2$

Finally, solving for $W_2$ , we get:

$W_2=\sqrt{\frac{3}{5} }W_1$

5 0

2 years ago

In a certain region of space, a uniform electric field has a magnitude of 4.30 x 104 n/c and points in the positive x direction.

denis23 [38]

The magnetic force exerted by a field E to a charge q is given by F=Eq. In this case, F=4.30*10^4*(6.80mu C). 1mu C=10^-6C, so F=4.30*6.80=10^-2=0.29N. The direction is in the x direction, the direction that the field is applied because the charge is positive.

5 0

2 years ago

The Bernoulli equation is valid for steady, inviscid, incompressible flows with a constant acceleration of gravity. Consider flo

irina1246 [14]

Answer:

$p+\frac{1}{2}ρV^{2}+ρg_{0}z-\frac{1}{2}ρcz^{2}=constant$

Explanation:

first write the newtons second law:

F $_{s}$ =δma $_{s}$

Applying bernoulli,s equation as follows:

∑ $δp+\frac{1}{2} ρδV^{2} +δγz=0\\$

Where, $δp$ is the pressure change across the streamline and $V$ is the fluid particle velocity

substitute $ρg$ for {tex]γ[/tex] and $g_{0}-cz$ for $g$

$dp+d(\frac{1}{2}V^{2}+ρ(g_{0}-cz)dz=0$

integrating the above equation using limits 1 and 2.

$\int\limits^2_1 \, dp +\int\limits^2_1 {(\frac{1}{2}ρV^{2} )} \, +ρ \int\limits^2_1 {(g_{0}-cz )} \,dz=0\\p_{1}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}ρ(V^{2})_{1}^{2}+ρg_{0}z_{1}^{2}-ρc(\frac{z^{2}}{2})_{1}^{2}=0\\p_{2}-p_{1}+\frac{1}{2}ρ(V^{2}_{2}-V^{2}_{1})+ρg_{0}(z_{2}-z_{1})-\frac{1}{2}ρc(z^{2}_{2}-z^{2}_{1})=0\\p+\frac{1}{2}ρV^{2}+ρg_{0}z-\frac{1}{2}ρcz^{2}=constant$

there the bernoulli equation for this flow is $p+\frac{1}{2}ρV^{2}+ρg_{0}z-\frac{1}{2}ρcz^{2}=constant$

note: $ρ$ =density(ρ) in some parts and change(δ) in other parts of this equation. it just doesn't show up as that in formular

4 0

2 years ago

Variations in the resistivity of blood can give valuable clues about changes in various properties of the blood. Suppose a medic

Elena-2011 [213]

Answer:

Answer:

1.1 x 10^9 ohm metre

Explanation:

diameter = 1.5 mm

length, l = 5 cm

Potential difference, V = 9 V

current, i = 230 micro Ampere = 230 x 10^-6 A

radius, r = diameter / 2 = 1.5 / 2 = 0.75 x 10^-3 m

Let the resistivity is ρ.

Area of crossection

A = πr² = 3.14 x 0.75 x 0.75 x 10^-6 = 1.766 x 10^-6 m^2

Use Ohm's law to find the value of resistance

V = i x R

9 = 230 x 10^-6 x R

R = 39130.4 ohm

Use the formula for the resistance

$R=\rho \frac{l}{A}$

$\rho =\frac{RA}{l}$

$\rho =\frac{39130.4\times 0.05}{1.766\times 10^{-6}}$

ρ = 1.1 x 10^9 ohm metre

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago