Answer:
a) The sign of the charge is positive.
b) The magnetic force on the particle is 0.050 newtons.
Explanation:
The magnetic force F on a moving charge with velocity v passing through a magnetic field B is:
(1)
a)
Because it is a cross product, we can find the direction of the force using the right-hand rule, that is too the direction of the movement. We have two possibilities here because the velocity vector and magnetic field are perpendicular: the particle deflects towards east or toward west, which depends on the charge of the particle. Note that if you put your right hand fingers, except thumb, pointing towards north (direction of velocity) and later close them in the direction of the magnetic field, if you maintain your thumb perpendicular to this movement it will point towards east (See figure), so that will be de direction of the force if the charge is positive, but if the charge is negative, the direction will be opposite (towards west). So the charge has to be positive to deflects towards east.
b)
Now by 1:

<span>At time t1 = 0 since the body is at rest, the body has an angular velocity, v1, of 0. At time t = X, the body has an angular velocity of 1.43rad/s2. Since Angular acceleration is just the difference in angular speed by time. We have 4.44 = v2 -v1/t2 -t1 where V and t are angular velocity and time. So we have 4.44 = 1.43 -0/X - 0. Hence X = 1.43/4.44 = 0.33s.</span>
Answer:
The average magnitude of magnetic field B= 0.0433/ d Tesla
(You have not provided length of side of loop, so if you divide this value by length you will get value of magnetic field.)
Explanation:
Induced emf
where B= magnetic field
d= breadth of rectangular piece
V= velocity with which the rectangular piece = o.o6m/s
n= no of turns = 10
EMF = 26mV
since d (breadth of the frame) is not given, I will use it as a variable
EMF= n×B×d×V ------------------(1) (EMF induced due to multiple turns)
From eq 1, we get
B= (EMF)/(n d V)
B= (26 X 0.001) / (10 d 0.06)
B= 0.0433/ d Tesla
They are both right because you can note both things, I mean Raphael and Lucinda, both has a right statement or explanation about the wave. Wave by nothing is both for its wavelength and for its frequency. So Raphael and Lucinda are both correct because you can note both wavelength and frequency.