answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lana66690 [7]
2 years ago
13

A beam of electrons is accelerated from rest through a potential difference of 0.200 kV and then passes through a thin slit. Whe

n viewed far from the slit, the diffracted beam shows its first diffraction minima at ± 13.6 ∘ from the original direction of the beam.
Do we need to use relativity formulas? Select the correct answer and explanation.

a. No. The electrons gain kinetic energy K as they are accelerated through a potential difference V, so Ve=K=mc2/(γ−1). The potential difference is 0.200 kV , soVe= 0.200 keV. Solving for γ and using the fact that the rest energy of an electron is0.511 MeV, we have γ–1=(0.511MeV)/(0.200keV) so γ−1>>1 which means that we do not have to use special relativity.
b. Yes. The electrons gain kinetic energy K as they are accelerated through a potential difference V, so Ve=K=(γ−1)mc2. The potential difference is 0.200 kV , soVe= 0.200 keV. Solving for γ and using the fact that the rest energy of an electron is0.511 MeV, we have γ–1=(0.200keV)/(0.511MeV) so γ<<1 which means that we have to use special relativity.
c. Yes. The electrons gain kinetic energy K as they are accelerated through a potential difference V, so Ve=K=mc2/(γ−1). The potential difference is 0.200 kV , soVe= 0.200 keV. Solving for γ and using the fact that the rest energy of an electron is0.511 MeV, we have γ–1=(0.511MeV)/(0.200keV) so γ>>1 which means that we have to use special relativity.
d. No. The electrons gain kinetic energy K as they are accelerated through a potential difference V, so Ve=K=(γ−1)mc2. The potential difference is 0.200 kV , soVe= 0.200 keV. Solving for γ and using the fact that the rest energy of an electron is 0.511 MeV, we have γ–1=(0.200keV)/(0.511MeV) so γ−1<<1 which means that we do not have to use special relativity.

Part B

How wide is the slit?
Physics
1 answer:
fgiga [73]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

a) the correct answer is d , b)    a = 3.69 10⁻⁸ m

Explanation:

a) to see which answer is correct let's sketch the solution to the problem

            ΔU = K

            K = (γ -1) mc²

            (γ -1) = K / mc²

            (γ-1) = ΔU / mc²

            (γ-1) = e V / mc²

           

If we work in electron volt units ΔU = V    [eV]

           (γ-1) = V / mc²

           (γ -1) = 0.2 10³ / 0.511 10⁶

           (γ -1) = 3.9 10⁻⁴

As it is very small, relativistic corrections are not necessary.

Checking the correct answer is d

b) let's use De Broglie's relationship to find the wavelength of electrons

           λ = h / p = h / mv

Let's look for the speed of electrons, for this we use the concept of energy conservation

Initial

        Em₀ = ΔU = e ΔV

Final

         Emf = K = ½ m v²

         Em₀ = Emf

        e ΔV = ½ m v²

        v = √ (2 e ΔV / m)

        v = √ (2 1.60 10⁻¹⁹ 0.2 10³ / 9.1 10⁻³¹)

        v = √ (70.33 10¹²)

        v = 8.39 10⁶ m / s

Much less than the speed of light

We replace

             λ = 6.63 10⁻³⁴ / (9.1 10⁻³¹ 8.39 10⁶)

            λ = 8.68 10⁻⁹ m

The diffraction is explained by the expression

           a sin θ = m λ

The minimum occurs for m = 1

           a = λ / sin θ

           a = 8.68 10⁻⁹ / sin 13.6

           a = 3.69 10⁻⁸ m

You might be interested in
Two very large, flat plates are parallel to each other. Plate A, located at y=1.0 cm, is along the xz-plane and carries a unifor
Dmitry [639]

Answer:

 E ≈ 1.70 10⁵ N/C

Explanation:

The electric field is a vector quantity, so we can calculate the field of each plate and then add them. To calculate the field of a plate let's use Gauss's law

       Φ = ∫ E. dA = q_{int} / ε₀

To apply this law we must create a Gaussian surface that takes advantage of the symmetry of the problem. The electric field lines on the surface are perpendicular, so the Gaussian surface that will be a cylinder with the base parallel to the plate.

On this surface the normal to the base (A) is parallel to the field lines whereby the scalar product is reduced to the ordinary product. The normal on the sides of the cylinder is perpendicular to the field, therefore, the product scale is zero.

        ∫I E dA = q_{int}  /ε₀

Let's look for the load under the cylinder, let's use the concept of load density

        σ =  q_{int} / A

         q_{int} = σ A

Let's write Gauss's law for this case

       E A =  q_{int} /ε₀  

       E A = σ A / ε₀

       E = σ / ε₀

As the field is emitted for each side of the plate the value to only one side is

      E = G / 2ε₀  

This expression is the same for each plate, now let's add the electric field at the requested point

     R = (0.50, 0.00, 0.00) cm

We see that this point is on the X axis, between the plates that are at the points y = -1.0 cm and y = 1.0 cm, as the plates are very large the test point is between them

The negative plate has an incoming field and the positive plate has an outgoing field, the test load is always positive. The field due to the negative plate goes to the left, the field through the positive plate goes to the left at this point whereby two are added

     E = E_ + E +

     E = σ1 / 2ε₀  + σ2 / 2ε₀  

     E = 1 / 2o (σ1 + σ2)

Let's calculate the value

     E = 1/2 8.85 10⁻¹² (1.00 10⁻⁶ + 2.00 10⁻⁶)

     E = 3 10⁻⁶ / 17.7 10⁻¹²

     E = 1,695 10⁵ N / C

     E ≈ 1.70 10⁵ N/C

6 0
2 years ago
A car covers 72 kilometers in the first hour of its journey. In the next hour, it covers 90 kilometers. What is the amount of wo
kap26 [50]
The amount of work done can be solved using the formula:

Work = Force x Distance = Change in kinetic energy

Kinetic energy can be solved using the formula: KE = (1/2)*m*v^2
So, change in kinetic energy = (1/2)*m*(Vf)^2 - (1/2)*m*(Vo)^2

Where:

Vf = final velocity = 90 kph = 25 m/s
Vo = initial velocity = 72 kph = 20 m/s

substituting the given values:

Work = (1/2)*2500*(25^2) - (1/2)*2500*(20^2) = 281250 J, which can also be expressed as 2.8 x 10^5 Joules.

Among the choices, the correct answer is A.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where is there kinetic energy in this system?
Alika [10]

Answer:

So kinetic means to move, something like that right, so the two balls that go in the air are where the kinetic energy is.

Explanation:

Hope it helps.

6 0
1 year ago
An infinite sheet of charge, oriented perpendicular to the x-axis, passes through x = 0. It has a surface charge density σ1 = -2
docker41 [41]

1) At x = 6.6 cm,  E_x=3.47\cdot 10^6 N/C

2) At x = 6.6 cm, E_y=0

3) At x = 1.45 cm, E_x=-3.76\cdot 10^6N/C

4) At x = 1.45 cm, E_y=0

5) Surface charge density at b = 4 cm: +62.75 \mu C/m^2

6) At x = 3.34 cm, the x-component of the electric field is zero

7) Surface charge density at a = 2.9 cm: +65.25 \mu C/m^2

8) None of these regions

Explanation:

1)

The electric field of an infinite sheet of charge is perpendicular to the sheet:

E=\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}

where

\sigma is the surface charge density

\epsilon_0=8.85\cdot 10^{-12}F/m is the vacuum permittivity

The field produced by a thick slab, outside the slab itself, is the same as an infinite sheet.

So, the electric field at x = 6.6 cm (which is on the right of both the sheet and the slab) is the superposition of the fields produced by the sheet and by the slab:

E=E_1+E_2=\frac{\sigma_1}{2\epsilon_0}+\frac{\sigma_2}{2\epsilon_0}

where

\sigma_1=-2.5\mu C/m^2 = -2.5\cdot 10^{-6}C/m^2\\\sigma_2=64 \muC/m^2 = 64\cdot 10^{-6}C/m^2

The field of the sheet is to the left (negative charge, inward field), while the field of the slab is the right (positive charge, outward field).

So,

E=\frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\sigma_1+\sigma_2)=\frac{1}{2(8.85\cdot 10^{-12})}(-2.5\cdot 10^{-6}+64\cdot 10^{-6})=3.47\cdot 10^6 N/C

And the negative sign indicates that the direction is to the right.

2)

We note that the field produced both by the sheet and by the slab is perpendicular to the sheet and the slab: so it is directed along the x-direction (no component along the y-direction).

So the total field along the y-direction is zero.

This is a consequence of the fact that both the sheet and the slab are infinite along the y-axis. This means that if we take a random point along the x-axis, the y-component of the field generated by an element of surface dS of the sheet (or the slab), dE_y, is equal and opposite to the y-component of the field generated by an element of surface dS of the sheet located at exactly on the opposite side with respect to the x-axis, -dE_y. Therefore, the net field along the y-direction is always zero.

3)

Here it is similar to part 1), but this time the point is located at

x = 1.45 cm

so between the sheet and the slab. This means that both the fields of the sheet and of the slab are to the left, because the slab is negatively charged (so the field is outward). Therefore, the total field is

E=E_1-E_2

Substituting the same expressions of part 1), we find

E=\frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\sigma_1-\sigma_2)=\frac{1}{2(8.85\cdot 10^{-12})}(-2.5\cdot 10^{-6}-64\cdot 10^{-6})=-3.76\cdot 10^6N/C

where the negative sign indicates that the direction is to the left.

4)

This part is similar to part 2). Since the field is always perpendicular to the slab and the sheet, it has no component along the y-axis, therefore the y-component of the electric field is zero.

5)

Here we note that the slab is conductive: this means that the charges in the slab are free to move.

We note that the net charge on the slab is positive: this means that there is an excess of positive charge overall. Also, since the sheet (on the left of the slab) is negatively charged, the positive charges migrate to the left end of the slab (at a = 2.9 cm) while the negative charges migrate to the right end (at b = 4 cm).

The net charge per unit area of the slab is

\sigma=+64\mu C/m^2

And this the average of the surface charge density on both sides of the slab, a and b:

\sigma=\frac{\sigma_a+\sigma_b}{2} (1)

Also, the infinite sheet located at x = 0, which has a negative charge \sigma_1=-2.5\mu C/m^2, induces an opposite net charge on the left surface of the slab, so

\sigma_a-\sigma_b = +2.5 \mu C/m^2 (2)

Now we have two equations (1) and (2), so we can solve to find the surface charge densities on a and b, and we find:

\sigma_a = +65.25 \mu C/m^2\\\sigma_b = +62.75 \mu C/m^2

6)

Here we want to calculate the value of the x-component of the electric field at

x = 3.34 cm

We notice that this point is located inside the slab, because its edges are at

a = 2.9 cm

b = 4.0 cm

But slab is conducting , and the electric field inside a conductor is always zero (because the charges are in equilibrium): therefore, this means that the x-component of the electric field inside the slab is zero

7)

We  calculated the value of the charge per unit area on the surface of the slab at x = a = 2.9 cm in part 5), and it is \sigma_a = +65.25 \mu C/m^2

8)

As we said in part 6), the electric field inside a conductor is always zero. Since the slab in this problem is conducting, this means that the electric field inside the slab is zero: therefore, the regions where the field is zero is

2.9 cm < x < 4 cm

So the correct answer is

"none of these region"

Learn more about electric fields:

brainly.com/question/8960054

brainly.com/question/4273177

#LearnwithBrainly

8 0
2 years ago
Two disks with the same rotational inertia i are spinning about the same frictionless shaft, with the same angular speed ω, but
valentina_108 [34]

Answer:

3. none of these

Explanation:

The rotational kinetic energy of an object is given by:

K=\frac{1}{2}I \omega^2

where

I is the moment of inertia

\omega is the angular speed

In this problem, we have two objects rotating, so the total rotational kinetic energy will be the sum of the rotational energies of each object.

For disk 1:

K_1 = \frac{1}{2}I (\omega)^2 = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2

For disk 2:

K_2 = \frac{1}{2}I(-\omega)^2 = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2

so the total energy is

K=K_1 + K_2 = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2 + \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2 = I\omega^2

So, none of the options is correct.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Juan is standing on the street. An ambulance moves toward him and then passes by. What best describes the pitch that Juan hears?
    13·2 answers
  • Another term for electromotive force is _____.<br><br> voltage<br> current<br> resistance<br> power
    7·1 answer
  • A glass jug can be used to play different pitched sounds by blowing air over the opening of the jug and vibrating the air molecu
    7·1 answer
  • Divers found two substances on the bottom of the ocean. At room temperature, both substances are liquid. Scientists then transfe
    9·2 answers
  • Two girls,(masses m1 and m2) are on roller skates and stand at rest, close to each other and face-to-face. Girl 1 pushes squarel
    10·1 answer
  • Air at 27 ºC and 5 atm is throttled by a valve to 1 atm. If the valve is adiabatic and the change in kinetic energy is negligibl
    15·1 answer
  • For a short time the position of a roller-coaster car along its path is defined by the equations r=25 m, θ=(0.3t) rad, and z=(−8
    14·1 answer
  • José and Laurel measured the length of a stick's shadow during the day. Without knowing the length of the stick, which of their
    10·1 answer
  • The difference between the two molar specific heats of a gas is 8000J/kgK. If the ratio of the two specific heats is 1.65, calcu
    5·1 answer
  • Calculate the mass (in kg) of 54.3 m³ of granite. The density of granite is 2700 kg/m³. Give your answer to 2 decimal places.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!