Where is there kinetic energy in this system?

The lighting needs of a storage room are being met by six fluorescent light fixtures, each fixture containing four lamps rated a

Amanda [17]

Answer:

amount of energy = 4730.4 kWh/yr

amount of money = 520.34 per year

payback period = 0.188 year

Explanation:

given data

light fixtures = 6

lamp = 4

power = 60 W

average use = 3 h a day

price of electricity = $0.11/kWh

to find out

the amount of energy and money that will be saved and simple payback period if the purchase price of the sensor is $32 and it takes 1 h to install it at a cost of $66

solution

we find energy saving by difference in time the light were

ΔE = no of fixture × number of lamp × power of each lamp × Δt

ΔE is amount of energy save and Δt is time difference

so

ΔE = 6 × 4 × 365 ( 12 - 9 )

ΔE = 4730.4 kWh/yr

and

money saving find out by energy saving and unit cost that i s

ΔM = ΔE × Munit

ΔM = 4730.4 × 0.11

ΔM = 520.34 per year

and

payback period is calculate as

payback period = $\frac{excess initial cost}{\Delta M}$

payback period = $\frac{32 + 66}{520.34}$

payback period = 0.188 year

8 0

2 years ago

In the sport of curling, large smooth stones are slid across an ice court to land on a target. Sometimes the stones need to move

lara31 [8.8K]

Answer:

To increase kinetic friction, the amount of fine water droplets sprayed before the game is limited.

To reduce kinetic friction. increase the amount of fine water droplets during pregame preparation and sweeping in front of the curling stones.

Explanation:

In curling sports, since the ice sheets are flat, the friction on the stone would be too high and the large smooth stone would not travel half as far. Thus controlling the amount of fine water droplets sprayed before the game is limited pregame is necessary to increase friction.

On the other hand, reducing ice kinetic friction involves two ways. The first way is adding bumps to the ice which is known as pebbling. Fine water droplets are sprayed onto the flat ice surface. These droplets freeze into small "pebbles", which the curling stones "ride" on as they slide down the ice. This increases contact pressure which lowers the friction of the stone with the ice. As a result, the stones travel farther, and curl less.

The second way to reduce the kinetic friction is sweeping in front of the large smooth stone. The sweeping action quickly heats and melts the pebbles on the ice leaving a film of water. This film reduces the friction between the stone and ice.

8 0

2 years ago

A (1.25+A) kg bowling ball is hung on a (2.50+B) m long rope. It is then pulled back until the rope makes an angle of (12.0+C)o

daser333 [38]

Answer:

F = 0.535 N

Explanation:

Let's use the concepts of energy, at the highest and lowest point of the trajectory

Higher

Em₀ = U = mg y

Lower

$Em_{f}$ = K = ½ m v²

Emo = $Em_{f}$

mg y = ½ m v2

v = √ 2gy

y = L - L cos θ

v = √ (2g L (1-cos θ))

Now let's use Newton's second law n at the lowest point where the acceleration is centripetal

F = ma

a = v² / r

In turning radius is the cable length r = L

F = m 2g (1-cos θ)

Let's calculate

F = 2 1.25 9.8 (1 - cos 12)

F = 0.535 N

7 0

2 years ago

If the gas in a container absorbs 275 Joules of heat, has 125 Joules of work done on it, then does 50 Joules of work, what is th

cluponka [151]

Answer:

The increase in the internal energy = 350 J

Explanation:

Given that

Q= 275 J

W= - 125 J

W' = 50 J

W(net)= -125 + 50 = -75 J

Sign -

1.Heat rejected by system - negative

2.Heat gain by system - Positive

3.Work done by system = Positive

4.Work done on the system-Negative

Lets take change in the internal energy =ΔU

We know that

Q= ΔU + W(net)

275 = ΔU -75

ΔU= 275 + 75 J

ΔU=350 J

The increase in the internal energy = 350 J

7 0

2 years ago

: Two containers have a substantial amount of the air evacuated out of them so that the pressure inside is half the pressure at

ser-zykov [4K]

Complete Question

Two containers have a substantial amount of the air evacuated out of them so that the pressure inside is half the pressure at sea level. One container is in Denver at an altitude of about 6,000 ft and the other is in New Orleans (at sea level). The surface area of the container lid is A=0.0155 m. The air pressure in Denver is PD = 79000 Pa. and in New Orleans is PNo = 100250 Pa. Assume the lid is weightless.

Part (a) Write an expression for the force FNo required to remove the container lid in New Orleans.

Part (b) Calculate the force FNo required to lift off the container lid in New Orleans, in newtons.

Part (c) Calculate the force Fp required to lift off the container lid in Denver, in newtons.

Part (d) is more force required to lift the lid in Denver (higher altitude, lower pressure) or New Orleans (lower altitude, higher pressure)?

Answer:

a

The expression is $F_{No} = A [P_{No} - \frac{P_{sea}}{2}]$

b

$F_{No}= 7771.125 \ N$

c

$F_p = 2.2*10^{6} N$

d

From the value obtained we can say the that the force required to open the lid is higher at Denver

Explanation:

The altitude of container in Denver is $d_D = 6000 \ ft = 6000 * 0.3048 = 1828.8m$

The surface area of the container lid is $A = 0.0155m^2$

The altitude of container in New Orleans is sea-level

The air pressure in Denver is $P_D = 79000 \ Pa$

The air pressure in new Orleans is $P_{ro} = 100250 \ Pa$

Generally force is mathematically represented as

$F_{No} = \Delta P A$

So we are told the pressure inside is is half the pressure the at sea level so the the pressure acting on the container would

The pressure at sea level is a constant with a value of

$P_{sea} = 101000 Pa$

So the $\Delta P$ which is the difference in pressure within and outside the container is

$\Delta P = P_{No} - \frac{P_{sea}}{2}$

Therefore

$F_{No} = A [P_{No} - \frac{P_{sea}}{2}]$

Now substituting values

$F_{No} = 0.0155 [100250 - \frac{101000}{2}]$

$F_{No}= 7771.125 \ N$

The force to remove the lid in Denver is

$F_p = \Delta P_d A$

So we are told the pressure inside is is half the pressure the at sea level so the the pressure acting on the container would

The pressure at sea level is a constant with a value of

$P_{sea} = 101000 Pa$

At sea level the air pressure in Denver is mathematically represented as

$P_D = \rho g h$

=> $g = \frac{P_D}{\rho h}$

Let height at sea level is h = 1

The air pressure at height $d_D$

$P_d__{D}} = \rho gd_D$

=> $g = \frac{P_d_D}{\rho d_D}$

Equating the both

$\frac{P_D}{\rho h} = \frac{P_d_D}{\rho d_D}$

$P_d_D = P_D * d_D$

Substituting value

$P_d__{D}} = 1828.2 * 79000$

$P_d__{D}} = 1.445*10^{8} Pa$

So

$\Delta P_d = P_{d} _D - \frac{P_{sea}}{2}$

=> $\Delta P_d = 1.445 *10^{8} - \frac{101000}{2}$

$\Delta P_d = 1.44*10^{8}Pa$

So

$F_p = \Delta P_d A$

$= 1.44*10^8 * 0.0155$

$F_p = 2.2*10^{6} N$

6 0

2 years ago