Answer:
No, the resulting wave in the diagram does not demonstrate destructive interference. The resulting wave in the diagram shows a bigger wave than Wave 1 or Wave 2. If it demonstrated destructive interference, it would be a smaller wave or a horizontal line. With destructive interference, waves break down to form a smaller wave, or cancel each other out, resulting in no wave formation.
Well we can't see the picture that the teacher has, and we have to figure out what's in the picture from some clues in the answer choices. The picture seems to show an atom with 3 protons and 3 neutrons in the nucleus, and 3 electrons whizzing around the nucleus.
If that's what's in the picture, then Mike is correct (first choice), because the atomic number shows the number of protons in all atoms. There are 3 protons and the atomic number of lithium is 3.
Second choice . . . False, because electrons are not involved in the atomic mass.
Third and fourth choices . . . both false; sadly, Joan is woefully unclear on the concepts.
Answer:
43.58 m
Explanation:
If you travel 500 m on a straight road that slopes upward at a constant angle of 5 degrees
Using trigonometry ratio
Sin 5 = opposite/hypothenus
Where the hypothenus = 500m
Opposite = height h
Sin 5 = h/500
Cross multiply
500 × sin 5 = h
h = 500 × 0.08715
h = 43.58m
Therefore, the height above the starting point is equal to 43.58m
Answer:
The magnitude of the average force exerted on the water by the blade is 960 N.
Explanation:
Given that,
The mass of water per second that strikes the blade is, 
Initial speed of the oncoming stream, u = 16 m/s
Final speed of the outgoing water stream, v = -16 m/s
We need to find the magnitude of the average force exerted on the water by the blade. It can be calculated using second law of motion as :
F = -960 N
So, the magnitude of the average force exerted on the water by the blade is 960 N. Hence, this is the required solution.
