I would go with the second statement is true because if all of the other ones mentioned in the problem had something that would not work either the one before or after would make the statement false excepted for statement two
Answer:
3rd option
Step-by-step explanation:
So we are given the following points:
(1,5)
(2,15)
(3,45)
(4,135)
This is a geometric sequence because there is a common ratio, 3. That is you can keep multiply 3 to a previous y-coordinate to get the next y-coordinate.
The formula for a geometric sequence is 
where 
is the first term and r is the common ration.
So we have
.
If you want to know the fifth term, just plug in 5:
Simplifying:
Answer:
Rs. 112000
Step-by-step explanation:
- Borrowed money = Rs. 126000
- Interest rate = 15% PA simple
- Time = 3 years
<u>Hari is due to pay after 3 years:</u>
- 126000* (1+ 3*15/100) = 182700
He pays Rs. 70700, remaining money is cleared by giving buffalo.
<u>Cost of buffalo:</u>
- 182700 - 70700= Rs. 112000
<u>Answer is:</u> Rs. 112000
2 1/2 = 5/2
<span>ratio : 5/2 : 3/5 (soda to pineapple) </span>
<span>multiply by 2/5 </span>
<span>ratio : 1 : 6/25 (1 unit of soda to 6/25 units of pineapple)</span>
Two events are said to be Disjoint or Mutually Exclusive if the two events can not happen at the same time.For example when we throw a die getting an even number is disjoint to getting an odd number.
I.e Probability(A∩B)=0
Let me explain this concept through venn diagram.
Pr[A∪B]=0.7, Pr[A]=0.25
Since events are Disjoint
Pr[A∩B]=0
Pr[A∪B]=Pr[A] + Pr[B]
0.7=0.25 +Pr[B]
0.7-0.25=Pr[B]
⇒Pr[B]=0.45=45/100=9/20
Now events are said to be independent if Pr[A and B]=Pr[A] ×Pr[B]
Events are said to be independent if occurrence of one is not affected by occurrence of other.For example getting multiple of 2 as one event and getting multiple of 3 as second event when we throw a die.
Pr[A∪B]=0.7, Pr[A]=0.25
Pr[A∪B]= Pr[A]+ Pr[B]-Pr[A∩B]
But Pr[A∩B]= Pr[A] ×Pr[B]
⇒Pr[A∪B]= Pr[A]+ Pr[B]- Pr[A] ×Pr[B]
⇒0.7=0.25+p-0.25×p
⇒0.7-0.25=p- 0.25 p
⇒0.45=0.75 p
⇒p= 0.45/0.75
⇒p =3/5
