What is the transmitted intensity of light if an additional polarizer is added perpendicular to the first polarizer in the setup
described in Question 3
1 answer:
Answer:
3) Transmitted intensity of light if unpolarized light passes through a single polarizing filter = 40 W/m²
- Transmitted intensity of light if an additional polarizer is added perpendicular to the first polarizer in the setup described = 7.5 W/m²
Explanation:
Complete Question
3) What is the transmitted intensity of light if unpolarized light passes through a single polarizing filter and the initial intensity is 80 W/m²?
- What is the transmitted intensity of light if an additional polarizer is added perpendicular to the first polarizer in the setup described in Question 3 (the setup)? Show all work in your answer.
The image of this setup attached to this question as obtained from online is attached to this solution.
Solution
3) When unpolarized light passes through a single polarizer, the intensity of the light is cut in half.
Hence, if the initial intensity of unpolarized light is I₀ = 80 W/m²
The intensity of the light rays thay pass through the first single polarizer = I₁ = (I₀/2) = (80/2) = 40 W/m²
- According to Malus' law, the intensity of transmitted light through a polarizer is related to the intensity of the incident light and the angle at which the polarizer is placed with respect to the major axis of the polarizer before the current polarizer of concern.
I₂ = I₁ cos² θ
where
I₂ = intensity of light that passes through the second polarizer = ?
I₁ = Intensity of light from the first polarizer that is incident upon the second polarizer = 40 W/m²
θ = angle between the major axis of the first and second polarizer = 30°
I₂ = 40 (cos² 30°) = 40 (0.8660)² = 30 W/m²
In the same vein, the intensity of light that passes through the third/additional polarizer is related to the intensity of light that passes through the second polarizer and is incident upon this third/additional polarizer through
I₃ = I₂ cos² θ
I₃ = intensity of light that passes through the third/additional polarizer = ?
I₂ = Intensity of light from the second polarizer that is incident upon the third/additional polarizer = 30 W/m²
θ = angle between the major axis of the second and third/additional polarizer = 60° (although, it is 90° with respect to the first polarizer, it is the angle it makes with the major axis of the second polarizer, 60°, that matters)
I₃ = 30 (cos² 60°) = 30 (0.5)² = 7.5 W/m²
Hope this Helps!!!
You might be interested in
Answer
To understand this concept it is necessary to understand Newton's Second Law
According to Newtons Second law applied force is equal to rate of change of momentum of a body.
Mathematically,
here, is rate of change of momentum with respect to time
It means If two eggs fall from same height,one on softer surface and other on hard surface that time the momentum of both eggs will remain equal at both the surfaces. But, impact time will be different. On hard surface egg will stop almost instantly so impact time will be small and hence the force on egg will be large therefore the egg will breakup.
On the other hand on the soft surface like a cotton, egg will not stop instantly but it will slow down for a few seconds and then stop due to which the time of impact will increase. Therefore the force on egg will be less and it won't break up.
Answer:
The inducerd emf is 1.08 V
Solution:
As per the question:
Altitude of the satellite, H = 400 km
Length of the antenna, l = 1.76 m
Magnetic field, B =
Now,
When a conducting rod moves in a uniform magnetic field linearly with velocity, v, then the potential difference due to its motion is given by:
Here, velocity v is perpendicular to the rod
Thus
e = lvB (1)
For the orbital velocity of the satellite at an altitude, H:
where
G = Gravitational constant
= mass of earth
= radius of earth
Using this value value in eqn (1):