As we know that
here we know that
now from above equation we have
so image will form on left side of lens at a distance of 15 cm
This image will be magnified and virtual image
Ray diagram is attached below here
A farmer wants to determine which of two brands of cow feed is best for the cows on a farm. Before using one of the feeds on all
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
The correct option that represents an acceptable set of quantum numbers for an electron in an atom is;
(b) 4, 3, -3, 1/2.
Explanation:
To solve the question, we note that the available options where the set of quantum numbers for an electron in an atom are arranged as n, l, m l , and ms are;
4, 4, 4, 1/2
4, 3, -3, 1/2
4, 3, 0, 0
4, 5, 7, -1/2
4, 4, -5, 1/2
Let us label them as a to as follows
(a) 4, 4, 4, 1/2
(b) 4, 3, -3, 1/2
(c) 4, 3, 0, 0
(d) 4, 5, 7, -1/2
(e) 4, 4, -5, 1/2
Next we note the rules for the assignment and arrangement of quantum numbers are as follows
Number Symbol Possible values
Principal Quantum Number .......n........................1, 2, 3, ......n
Angular momentum quantum
number...............................................l.........................0, 1, 2, .......(n - 1)
Magnetic Quantum Number........m₁......................-l, ..., -1, 0, 1,.....,l
Spin Quantum Number.................m.....................+1/2, -1/2
We are meant to analyze each of the arrangement for acceptability.
Therefore for (a),
we note that the angular momentum quantum number, l =4 , is equal to the principal quantum number n =4 which violates the rule as the maximum value of the angular momentum quantum number is (n-1) where the maximum value of the principal quantum number is n.
Therefore (a) is not acceptable.
(b) Here we note that
The principal quantum number n = 4 ∈ (1, 2, 3, ......n) → acceptable
The angular momentum quantum number l = 3 ∈ (0, 1, 2, .......(n - 1)) → acceptable
The magnetic quantum number m₁ = -3 ∈ (-l, ..., -1, 0, 1,.....,l) → acceptable
The spin quantum number m = 1/2 ∈ (+1/2, -1/2) → acceptable
Therefore (b) 4, 3, -3, 1/2 represents an acceptable set of quantum numbers for an electron in an atom.
(c) Here we have
The principal quantum number n = 4 ∈ (1, 2, 3, ......n) → acceptable
The angular momentum quantum number l = 3 ∈ (0, 1, 2, .......(n - 1)) → acceptable
The magnetic quantum number m₁ = 0 ∈ (-l, ..., -1, 0, 1,.....,l) → acceptable
The spin quantum number m = 0 ∉ (+1/2, -1/2) → not acceptable
Therefore (c) 4, 3, 0, 0 does not represents an acceptable set of quantum numbers for an electron in an atom.
(d) Here we have;
The principal quantum number n = 4 ∈ (1, 2, 3, ......n) → acceptable
The angular momentum quantum number l = 5 ∉ (0, 1, 2, .......(n - 1)) → not acceptable
The magnetic quantum number m₁ = 7 ∉ (-l, ..., -1, 0, 1,.....,l) → acceptable
The spin quantum number m = -1/2 ∈ (+1/2, -1/2) → acceptable
Therefore (d) 4, 5, 7, -1/2 does not represents an acceptable set of quantum numbers for an electron in an atom.
(e) Here we have;
The principal quantum number n = 4 ∈ (1, 2, 3, ......n) → acceptable
The angular momentum quantum number l = 4 ∉ (0, 1, 2, .......(n - 1)) → not acceptable
The magnetic quantum number m₁ = -5 ∉ (-l, ..., -1, 0, 1,.....,l) → acceptable
The spin quantum number m = 1/2 ∈ (+1/2, -1/2) → acceptable
Therefore (e) 4, 4, -5, 1/2 does not represents an acceptable set of quantum numbers for an electron in an atom.
If no frictional work is considered, then the energy of the system (the driver at all positions is conserved.
Let
position 1 = initial height of the diver (h₁), together with the initial velocity (v₁).
position 2 = final height of the diver (h₂) and the final velocity (v₂).
The initial PE = mgh₁ and the initial KE = (1/2)mv₁²
where g = acceleration due to gravity,
m = mass of the diver.
Similarly, the final PE and KE are respectively mgh₂ and (1/2)mv₂².
PE in position 1 is converted into KE due to the loss in height from position 1 to position 2.
Therefore
(KE + PE) ₁ = (KE + PE)₂
Evaluate the given answers.
A) The total mechanical energy of the system increases.
FALSE
B) Potential energy can be converted into kinetic energy but not vice versa.
TRUE
C) (KE + PE)beginning = (KE + PE) end.
TRUE
D) All of the above.
FALSE
Let
position 1 = initial height of the diver (h₁), together with the initial velocity (v₁).
position 2 = final height of the diver (h₂) and the final velocity (v₂).
The initial PE = mgh₁ and the initial KE = (1/2)mv₁²
where g = acceleration due to gravity,
m = mass of the diver.
Similarly, the final PE and KE are respectively mgh₂ and (1/2)mv₂².
PE in position 1 is converted into KE due to the loss in height from position 1 to position 2.
Therefore
(KE + PE) ₁ = (KE + PE)₂
Evaluate the given answers.
A) The total mechanical energy of the system increases.
FALSE
B) Potential energy can be converted into kinetic energy but not vice versa.
TRUE
C) (KE + PE)beginning = (KE + PE) end.
TRUE
D) All of the above.
FALSE
To solve this problem we will apply the concepts related to gravity according to the Newtonian definitions. From finding this value we will use the linear motion kinematic equations to find the time. Our values are
Comet mass
Radius
Rock was dropped from a height 'h' from surface = 1m
The relation for acceleration due to gravity of a body of mass 'm' with radius 'r' is
Where G means gravitational universal constant and M the mass of the planet
Now calculate the value of the time
The time taken for the rock to reach the surface is t = 87.58s