Answer : The correct option is, 
Explanation :
Formula used :
where,
= heat released = 24 KJ
= mass of bomb calorimeter = 1.30 Kg
= specific heat =
= final temperature = ?
= initial temperature =
Now put all the given values in the above formula, we get the final temperature of the calorimeter.

Therefore, the final temperature of the calorimeter is, 
Answer:

Explanation:
Hello!
In this case, since these calorimetry problems are characterized by the fact that the calorimeter absorbs the heat released by the combustion of the substance, we can write:

Thus, given the temperature change and the total heat capacity, we obtain the following total heat of reaction:

Now, by dividing by the moles in 1.04 g of cyclopropane (42.09 g/mol) we obtain the enthalpy of combustion of this fuel:

Best regards!
Answer:
20% of phosphorus
Explanation:
A fertilizer is used to improve the fertility of soils. Most fertilizers contains the element nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium.
They are often designated NPK fertilizers.
Now we know that the numbers 10-20-20 depicts the nitrogen-phosphorus and potassium content of the fertilizer.
From the designation,
The actual percentage is 20% of phosphorus.
10% of nitrogen
20% of potassium
Answer : The correct option is, (a) paramagnetic with two unpaired electrons.
Explanation :
According to the molecular orbital theory, the general molecular orbital configuration will be,
![(\sigma_{1s}),(\sigma_{1s}^*),(\sigma_{2s}),(\sigma_{2s}^*),(\sigma_{2p_z}),[(\pi_{2p_x})=(\pi_{2p_y})],[(\pi_{2p_x}^*)=(\pi_{2p_y}^*)],(\sigma_{2p_z}^*)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%28%5Csigma_%7B1s%7D%29%2C%28%5Csigma_%7B1s%7D%5E%2A%29%2C%28%5Csigma_%7B2s%7D%29%2C%28%5Csigma_%7B2s%7D%5E%2A%29%2C%28%5Csigma_%7B2p_z%7D%29%2C%5B%28%5Cpi_%7B2p_x%7D%29%3D%28%5Cpi_%7B2p_y%7D%29%5D%2C%5B%28%5Cpi_%7B2p_x%7D%5E%2A%29%3D%28%5Cpi_%7B2p_y%7D%5E%2A%29%5D%2C%28%5Csigma_%7B2p_z%7D%5E%2A%29)
As there are 14 electrons present in the given configuration.
The molecular orbital configuration of molecule will be,
![(\sigma_{1s})^2,(\sigma_{1s}^*)^2,(\sigma_{2s})^2,(\sigma_{2s}^*)^2,(\sigma_{2p_z})^2,[(\pi_{2p_x})^1=(\pi_{2p_y})^1],[(\pi_{2p_x}^*)^0=(\pi_{2p_y}^*)^0],(\sigma_{2p_z}^*)^0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%28%5Csigma_%7B1s%7D%29%5E2%2C%28%5Csigma_%7B1s%7D%5E%2A%29%5E2%2C%28%5Csigma_%7B2s%7D%29%5E2%2C%28%5Csigma_%7B2s%7D%5E%2A%29%5E2%2C%28%5Csigma_%7B2p_z%7D%29%5E2%2C%5B%28%5Cpi_%7B2p_x%7D%29%5E1%3D%28%5Cpi_%7B2p_y%7D%29%5E1%5D%2C%5B%28%5Cpi_%7B2p_x%7D%5E%2A%29%5E0%3D%28%5Cpi_%7B2p_y%7D%5E%2A%29%5E0%5D%2C%28%5Csigma_%7B2p_z%7D%5E%2A%29%5E0)
The number of unpaired electron in the given configuration is, 2. So, this is paramagnetic. That means, more the number of unpaired electrons, more paramagnetic.
Hence, the correct option is, (a) paramagnetic with two unpaired electrons.
Answer:
+279.744 kJ.
Below is an attachment containing the solution to question.