Summary:
a= 12.0 m/(s^2)
v= 100m/s
t1= 2.0s => s1=?
t2=5.0s => s2=?
t3=10.0s => s3=?
——————
Solution:
• when t1=2.0 s, I have gone:
S1= v*t1 + 1/2*a*(t1^2)
=100.0 *2 + 1/2*12.0*(2.0^2)
=224 (m)
• when t2=5.0s, I have gone
S2=v*t2+ 1/2*a*(t2^2)
= 100*5.0+ 1/2*12.0*(5.0^2)
=650 (m)
•when t3= 10.0s, I have gone:
S3=v*t3+ 1/2*a*(t3^2)
=100*10.0+ 1/2*12*(10.0^2)
=1600 (m)
Answer:
E. downward and constant
Explanation:
Freefall is a special case of motion with constant acceleration because the acceleration due to gravity is always constant and downward. This is true even when an object is thrown upward or has zero velocity.
For example, when a ball is thrown up in the air, the ball's velocity is initially upward. Since gravity pulls the object toward the earth with a constant acceleration ggg, the magnitude of velocity decreases as the ball approaches maximum height. At the highest point in its trajectory, the ball has zero velocity, and the magnitude of velocity increases again as the ball falls back toward the earth.
Answer:
What is u should know it bc u should answered it already
Explanation:
To calculate the specific heat capacity of an object or substance, we can use the formula
c = E / m△T
Where
c as the specific heat capacity,
E as the energy applied (assume no heat loss to surroundings),
m as mass and
△T as the energy change.
Now just substitute the numbers given into the equation.
c = 2000 / 2 x 5
c = 2000/ 10
c = 200
Therefore we can conclude that the specific heat capacity of the block is 200 Jkg^-1°C^-1
Answer:
Rod 1 has greater initial angular acceleration; The initial angular acceleration for rod 1 is greater than for rod 2.
Explanation:
For the rod 1 the angular acceleration is
Similarly, for rod 2

Now, the moment of inertia for rod 1 is
,
and the torque acting on it is (about the center of mass)

therefore, the angular acceleration of rod 1 is


Now, for rod 2 the moment of inertia is


and the torque acting is (about the center of mass)


therefore, the angular acceleration
is


We see here that

therefore

In other words , the initial angular acceleration for rod 1 is greater than for rod 2.