<span>d. The parallaxes beyond a few thousand light years are
too small to be measured with common instruments.
I'm not sure that parallax can even be used out to a few
thousand light years.
The NEAREST star to Earth has the BIGGEST parallax.
The star is Alpha Centauri. It's only 4 light years away
from us, and its parallax is 0.000206 of a degree !
I have no idea how astronomers can measure angles
so small ... and that's the BIGGEST parallax angle of
ANY star.</span>
Answer:

Explanation:
Let 'F₁' and 'F₂' be the forces applied by left and right wires on the bar as shown in the diagram below.
Now, the horizontal and vertical components of these forces are:

As the system is in equilibrium, the net force in x and y directions is 0 and net torque about any point is also 0. Therefore,

Now, let us find the net torque about a point 'P' that is just above the center of mass at the upper edge of the bar.
At point 'P', there are no torques exerted by the F₁x and F₂x nor the weight of the bar as they all lie along the axis of rotation.
Therefore, the net torque by the forces
will be zero. This gives,

But, 
Therefore,


We know,

∴
The true statements about generators would be :
They convert motion energy to electric energy
They use the relative motion of a magnet and a coil of wire.
Explanation:
Generators use the energy of the rotating coil in relative motion with magnets to induce a current within the wire. Generators are devices that convert energy into a voltage by the relative motion of the magnet and a coil that changes flux.
Answer:
We can relate the kinetic energy of the particle to the potential difference between the plates by following equations:
Work energy theorem:




So,

If the distance is doubled and the potential difference is halved, then

Explanation:
As can be seen from the relationship between kinetic energy and the potential difference, the distance between the plates has no effect on the relation between kinetic energy and the potential difference. Since the charge of the second particle is equal to that of the first one, the new kinetic energy would be half of the first kinetic energy.