Answer:
Did you get the answer to this?
Explanation:
I need this too.
Answer:
Is not possible to make a buffer near of 7.
Optimal pH for sulfate‑based buffers is 2.
Explanation:
The dissociations of H₂SO₄ are:
H₂SO₄ ⇄ H⁺ + HSO₄⁻ pka₁ = -10
HSO₄⁻ ⇄ H⁺ + SO₄²⁻ pka₂ = 2.
The buffering capacity is pka±1. That means that for H₂SO₄ the buffering capacity is in pH's between <em>-11 and -9 and between 1 and 3</em>, having in mind that pH's<0 are not useful. For that reason, <em>is not possible to make a buffer near of 7.</em>
The optimal pH for sulfate‑based buffers is when pka=pH, that means that optimal pH is <em>2.</em>
<em />
I hope it helps!
A common factor is low pressure system.
Answer:
NaI > Na2SO4 > Co Br3
meaning that NaI has the highest freezing point, and Co Br3 has the lowest freezing point.
Explanation:
The freezing point depression is a colligative property.
That means that it depends on the number of solute particles dissolved.
The formula to calculate the freezing point depression of a solution of a non volatile solute is:
ΔTf = i * Kf * m
Where kf is a constant, m is the molality and i is the van't Hoff factor.
Molality, which is number of moles per kg of solvent, counts for the number of moles dissolved and the van't Hoff factor multipllies according for molecules that dissociate.
The higher the number of molecules that dissociate, the higher the van't Hoff, the greater the freezing point depression and the lower the freezing point.
As the question states that you assume equal concentrations (molality) and complete dissociation you just must find the number of ions generated by each solute, in this way:
NH4 I → NH4(+) + I(-) => 2 ions
Co Br3 → Co(+) + 3 Br(-) => 4 ions
Na2SO4 → 2Na(+) + SO4(2-) => 3 ions.
So, Co Br3 is the solute that generate more particles and that solution will exhibit the lowest freezing point among the options given, Na2SO4 is next and the NaI is the third. Ordering the freezing point from higher to lower the rank is NaI > Na2SO4 > CoBr3, which is the answer given.
Answer:
See explanation
Explanation:
% optical purity = specific rotation of mixture/specific rotation of pure enantiomer * 100/1
specific rotation of mixture = 23°
specific rotation of pure enantiomer = 61°
Hence;
% optical purity = 23/61 * 100 = 38 %
More abundant enantiomer = 100% - 38 % = 62%
Hence the pure (S) carvone is (-) 62° is the more abundant enantiomer.
Enantiomeric excess = 62 - 50/50 * 100 = 24%
Hence
(R) - carvone = 38 %
(S) - carvone = 62%