answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergeeva-Olga [200]
2 years ago
10

Experimental tests have shown that hammerhead sharks can detect magnetic fields. In one such test, 100 turns of wire were wrappe

d around a 7.0-m-diameter cylindrical shark tank. A magnetic field was created inside the tank when this coil of wire carried a current of 1.5 A. Sharks trained by getting a food reward when the field was present would later unambiguously respond when the field was turned on.Part A)What was the magnetic field strength in the center of the tank due to the current in the coil?Part B)Is the strength of the coil's field at the center of the tank larger or smaller than that of the earth?- larger- smaller
Physics
1 answer:
Triss [41]2 years ago
7 0

B = µo*N*I/2r  

So B = 4πx10^-7*150*1.6/2*3.5 = 4.31x10^-5T

You might be interested in
Two objects are placed in thermal contact and are allowed to come to equilibrium in isolation. the heat capacity of object a is
Harman [31]
Given:
Ca = 3Cb                      (1)
where
Ca =  heat capacity of object A
Cb =  heat capacity f object B

Also,
Ta = 2Tb                     (2)
where
Ta = initial temperature of object A
Tb = initial temperature of object B.

Let
Tf =  final equilibrium temperature of both objects,
Ma = mass of object A,
Mb = mass of object B.

Assuming that all heat exchange occurs exclusively between the two objects, then energy balance requires that
Ma*Ca*(Ta - Tf) = Mb*Cb*(Tf - Tb)           (3)

Substitute (1) and (2) into (3).
Ma*(3Cb)*(2Tb - Tf) = Mb*Cb*(Tf - Tb)
3(Ma/Mb)*(2Tb - Tf) = Tf - Tb

Define k = Ma/Mb, the ratio f the masses.
Then
3k(2Tb - Tf) = Tf - Tb
Tf(1+3k) = Tb(1+6k)
Tf = [(1+6k)/(1+3k)]*Tb

Answer:
T_{f} =( \frac{1+6k}{1+3k} )T_{b}= \frac{1}{2}( \frac{1+6k}{1+3k})T_{a}
where
k= \frac{M_{a}}{M_{b}} 
7 0
2 years ago
A 60-μC charge is held fixed at the origin and a −20-μC charge is held fixed on the x axis at a point x = 1.0 m. If a 10-μC char
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

Ek =  8,79 [J]

Explanation:

We are going to solve this problem, using  the energy conservation principle

State 1 or initial state (charges at rest t=0)

E₁  = Ek  + U₁

As charge are at rest Ek = 0

And  U₁ has two components

U₁₂   = K * Q₁*Q₂ / 0,4          and    U₃₂  = K*Q₃*Q₂ / 0,6

U₁₂  = 9*10⁹* 60*10⁻⁶*10*10⁻⁶/0,4  ⇒ U₁₂ = 9*60*10*10⁻³/0,4

U₃₂ =  - 9*10⁹* 20*10⁻⁶*10*10⁻⁶/0,6  ⇒ U₃₂ = - 9*20*10*10⁻³/0,6

U₁₂ = 540*10⁻2/0,4 [J]   ⇒13,5 [J]

U₃₂ = - 180*10⁻² /0,6 [J] ⇒ - 3 [J]

Then   E₁ = E₁₂ + E₃₂    

E₁ = 10,5 [J]

At  the moment of Q₂ passing x = 40 cm  or 0,4 m

E₂ = Ek + U₂

We can calculate the components of U₂ in this new configuration

U₂  =  U₁₂  + U₃₂

U₁₂  = 9*10⁹* 60*10⁻⁶*10*10⁻⁶/0,7   ⇒  U₁₂ = 9*60*10*10⁻³/0,7

U₁₂ = 540*10⁻²/0,7       U₁₂ = 7,71 [J]

U₃₂ =  - 9*10⁹* 20*10⁻⁶*10*10⁻⁶/0,3  ⇒ U₃₂ = -  9*20*10*10⁻³/0,3

U₃₂ = -  9*20*10⁻²/0,3  

U₃₂ = - 6

U₂ = 7,71 -6

U₂ = 1,71 [J]

Then as  

E₂  = Ek + U₂  and  E₂ = E₁

Then

Ek + U₂ = E₁

Ek =  10,5 - U₂    

Ek  = 10,5 - 1,71

Ek =  8,79 [J]

5 0
1 year ago
Planetary orbits... are spaced more closely together as they get further from the Sun. are evenly spaced throughout the solar sy
BaLLatris [955]

Answer:

E) are almost circular, with low eccentricities.

Explanation:

Kepler's laws establish that:

All the planets revolve around the Sun in an elliptic orbit, with the Sun in one of the focus (Kepler's first law).

A planet describes equal areas in equal times (Kepler's second law).

The square of the period of a planet will be proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis of its orbit (Kepler's third law).

T^{2} = a^{3}

Where T is the period of revolution and a is the semi-major axis.

Planets orbit around the Sun in an ellipse with the Sun in one of the focus. Because of that, it is not possible to the Sun to be at the center of the orbit, as the statement on option "C" says.

However, those orbits have low eccentricities (remember that an eccentricity = 0 corresponds to a circle)

In some moments of their orbit, planets will be closer to the Sun (known as perihelion). According with Kepler's second law to complete the same area in the same time, they have to speed up at their perihelion and slow down at their aphelion (point farther from the Sun in their orbit).

Therefore, option A and B can not be true.

In the celestial sphere, the path that the Sun moves in a period of a year is called ecliptic, and planets pass very closely to that path.  

4 0
2 years ago
The position of a particle moving along the x-axis varies with time according to x(t) = 5.0t^2 − 4.0t^3 m. Find (a) the velocity
KengaRu [80]
<h2>Answer:</h2>

(a) v(t) = [10.0t - 12.0t²] m/s  and a(t) = [10.0 - 24.0t ] m/s² respectively

(b) -28.0m/s and -38.0m/s² respectively

(c) 0.83s

(d) 0.83s

(e) x(t)  = 1.1573 m           [where t = 0.83s]

<h2>Explanation:</h2>

The position equation is given by;

x(t) = 5.0t² - 4.0t³ m           --------------------(i)

(a) Since velocity is the time rate of change of position, the velocity, v(t), of the particle as a function of time is calculated by finding the derivative of equation (i) as follows;

v(t) = dx(t) / dt = \frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt} [ 5.0t² - 4.0t³ ]

v(t) = 10.0t - 12.0t²     --------------------------------(ii)

Therefore, the velocity as a function of time is v(t) = 10.0t - 12.0t² m/s

Also, since acceleration is the time rate of change of velocity, the acceleration, a(t), of the particle as a function of time is calculated by finding the derivative of equation (ii) as follows;

a(t) = dx(t) / dt = \frac{dv}{dt} =  \frac{d}{dt} [ 10.0t - 12.0t² ]

a(t) = 10.0 - 24.0t             --------------------------------(iii)

Therefore, the acceleration as a function of time is a(t) = 10.0 - 24.0t m/s²

(b) To calculate the velocity at time t = 2.0s, substitute the value of t = 2.0 into equation (ii) as follows;

=> v(t) =  10.0t - 12.0t²

=> v(2.0) = 10.0(2) - 12.0(2)²

=> v(2.0) = 20.0 - 48.0

=> v(2.0) = -28.0m/s

Also, to calculate the acceleration at time t = 2.0s, substitute the value of t = 2.0 into equation (iii) as follows;

=> a(t) = 10.0 - 24.0t

=> a(2.0) = 10.0 - 24.0(2)

=> a(2.0) = 10.0 - 48.0

=> a(2.0) = -38.0 m/s²

Therefore, the velocity and acceleration at t = 2.0s are respectively -28.0m/s and -38.0m/s²

(c) The time at which the position is maximum is the time at which there is no change in position or the change in position is zero. i.e dx / dt = 0. It also means the time at which the velocity is zero. (since velocity is dx / dt)

Therefore, substitute v = 0 into equation (ii) and solve for t as follows;

=> v(t) = 10.0t - 12.0t²

=> 0 = 10.0t - 12.0t²

=> 0 = ( 10.0 - 12.0t ) t

=> t = 0            or             10.0 - 12.0t = 0

=> t = 0            or             10.0 = 12.0t

=> t = 0            or             t = 10.0 / 12.0

=> t = 0            or             t = 0.83s

At t=0 or t = 0.83s, the position of the particle will be maximum.

To get the more correct answer, substitute t = 0 and t = 0.83 into equation (i) as follows;

<em>Substitute t = 0 into equation (i)</em>

x(t) = 5.0(0)² - 4.0(0)³ = 0

At t = 0; x = 0

<em>Substitute t = 0.83s into equation (i)</em>

x(t) = 5.0(0.83)² - 4.0(0.83)³

x(t) = 5.0(0.6889) - 4.0(0.5718)

x(t) = 3.4445 - 2.2872

x(t)  = 1.1573 m

At t = 0.83; x = 1.1573 m

Therefore, since the value of x at t = 0.83s is 1.1573m is greater than the value of x at t = 0 which is 0m, then the time at which the position is at maximum is 0.83s

(d) The velocity will be zero when the position is maximum. That means that, it will take the same time calculated in (c) above for the velocity to be zero. i.e t = 0.83s

(e) The maximum position function is found when t = 0.83s as shown in (c) above;

Substitute t = 0.83s into equation (i)

x(t) = 5.0(0.83)² - 4.0(0.83)³

x(t) = 5.0(0.6889) - 4.0(0.5718)

x(t) = 3.4445 - 2.2872

x(t)  = 1.1573 m            [where t = 0.83s]

8 0
2 years ago
The short vertical parts adjacent to it also reach into the magnetic field and should experience forces. why can we neglect them
hammer [34]

It is not only the horizontal part of the loop that dips into the magnetic field. We can neglect or disregard the horizontal parts of the loop that hollows into the magnetic fields since only the parts perpendicular to the magnetic field complement to it.

<span> </span>

4 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Roseanne heated a solution in a beaker as part of a laboratory experiment on energy transfer. After a while, she noticed the liq
    5·1 answer
  • Part a consider another special case in which the inclined plane is vertical (θ=π/2). in this case, for what value of m1 would t
    7·1 answer
  • Submarine a travels horizontally at 11.0 m/s through ocean water. it emits a sonar signal of frequency f 5 5.27 3 103 hz in the
    6·1 answer
  • The drawing shows a side view of a swimming pool. The pressure at the surface of the water is atmospheric pressure. The pressure
    7·2 answers
  • Resistance of rod is 1 ohm. It is bent in the form of square. The resistance across adjoint corners is.​
    10·1 answer
  • I take 1.0 kg of ice and dump it into 1.0 kg of water and, when equilibrium is reached, I have 2.0 kg of ice at 0°C. The water w
    6·1 answer
  • A proton moves along the x-axis with vx=1.0×107m/s. As it passes the origin, what are the strength and direction of the magnetic
    11·1 answer
  • A cylindrical wire has a resistance R and resistivity ρ. If its length and diameter are BOTH cut in half, what will be its resis
    8·1 answer
  • Henri draws a wave that has a 4 cm distance between the midpoint and the trough. Geri draws a wave that has an 8 cm vertical dis
    15·2 answers
  • A rod 16.0 cm long is uniformly charged and has a total charge of -25.0 µC. Determine the magnitude and direction of the electri
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!