Protons and neutrons are the sub-atomic particles present in the nucleus of an atom where as electrons are present revolving round the nucleus in orbits. Electrons are negatively charged, protons are positively charged where as a neutron is a neutral species. It is the presence of electric charge that lead to the discovery of electrons (negative charge) and protons (positive charge), while it took time to discover neutral as they were electrically neutral species. Neutrons carrying no charge were not detected easily by passing electromagnetic radiations. Therefore, neutrons were the last of the three subatomic particles, to be discovered.
Answer:p-hydroxybenzaldehyde is stronger acid to phenol
para-cyanophenol is stronger acid to meta-cyanophenol
o-fluorophenol is stronger acid to p-fluorophenol.
Explanation:
The PKa tool relative to Ph are used to contrast the pairs.
The pKa of phenol is 10. The pKa of p-hydroxybenzaldehyde is 9.24
The pKa for meta-cyanophenol is 8.61 and the pKa for para-cyanophenol is 7.95.
The pKa value of o-fluorophenol is 8.7, while that of the p-fluorophenol is 9.9. It's obvious that the inductive effect is more dominant at ortho-position, which results in a more acidic nature
The pKa is the pH value at which a chemical species will accept or donate a proton. The lower the pKa, the stronger the acid and the greater the ability to donate a proton in aqueous solution.
Triprotic acid is a class of Arrhenius acids that are capable of donating three protons per molecule when dissociating in aqueous solutions. So the chemical reaction as described in the question, at the third equivalence point, can be show as: H3R + 3NaOH ⇒ Na3R + 3H2O, where R is the counter ion of the triprotic acid. Therefore, the ratio between the reacted acid and base at the third equivalence point is 1:3.
The moles of NaOH is 0.106M*0.0352L = 0.003731 mole. So the moles of H3R is 0.003731mole/3=0.001244mole.
The molar mass of the acid can be calculated: 0.307g/0.001244mole=247 g/mol.
While I am not the brainliest I can certainly answer.
This was a chemical change because the chemical components were changed, a big giveaway to this was the fizzing, however the temperature rising was also another giveaway.
The specific heat of aluminum, iron and copper is 0.897 J/g °C, 0.452 J/g °C and 0.385 J/g °C respectively.
The formula that relates specific heat capacity and change in temperature is as follows:
E=m×c×ΔT
Here, E is heat, m is mass, c is specific heat and ΔT is change in temperature.
On rearranging,
c=\frac{E}{m\times \Delta T}
Thus, change in temperature is inversely proportional to change in temperature. Change in temperature will be more for the element with low value of specific heat which is Cu in this case.
Since, the initial temperature is same for all the samples thus, Cu will reach the highest temperature.
