Answer:
Explanation:
No.
Las propiedades físicas de los materiales y sistemas a menudo se pueden clasificar como intensivas o extensivas, según cómo cambia la propiedad cuando cambia el tamaño (o extensión) del sistema. Según la IUPAC, una cantidad intensiva es aquella cuya magnitud es independiente del tamaño del sistema, mientras que una cantidad extensiva es aquella cuya magnitud es aditiva para los subsistemas. Esto refleja las ideas matemáticas correspondientes de media y medida, respectivamente.
Una propiedad intensiva es una propiedad a granel, lo que significa que es una propiedad física local de un sistema que no depende del tamaño del sistema o de la cantidad de material en el sistema. Los ejemplos de propiedades intensivas incluyen temperatura, T; índice de refracción, n; densidad, ρ; y dureza de un objeto.
Por el contrario, propiedades extensivas como la masa, el volumen y la entropía de los sistemas son aditivas para los subsistemas porque aumentan y disminuyen a medida que crecen y se reducen, respectivamente.
Estas dos categorías no son exhaustivas, ya que algunas propiedades, físicas no son exclusivamente intensivas ni extensivas. Por ejemplo, la impedancia eléctrica de dos subsistemas es aditiva cuando, y solo cuando, se combinan en serie; mientras que si se combinan en paralelo, la impedancia resultante es menor que la de cualquiera de los subsistemas.
¡Espero haberte ayudado! :)
Answer:
b
. Irradiated food is shown to not be radioactive.
Explanation:
If it can be proven that irradiated food is not radioactive, then it will effective dispute the idea that irradiated food are less safe to eat.
- An irradiated food is one in which ionizing radiations have been employed to improve food quality.
- Thus, bacteria and other food spoilers can be exterminated from the food.
- Most irradiated food do not contain radiation and are fit for consumption.
If it can be proven, that this is true, then it will challenge the idea that irradiated foods are not safe.
Answer:
8.0 moles
Explanation:
Since the acid is monoprotic, 1 mole of the acid will be required to stochiometrically react with 1 mole of NaOH.
Using the formula: 
Concentration of acid = ?
Volume of acid = 10 mL
Concentration of base = 1.0 M
Volume of base = 40 mL
mole of acid = 1
mole of base = 1
Substitute into the equation:

Concentration of acid = 40/10 = 4.0 M
To determine the number of moles of acid present in 2.0 liters of the unknown solution:
Number of moles = Molarity x volume
molarity = 4.0 M
Volume = 2.0 Liters
Hence,
Number of moles = 4.0 x 2.0 = 8 moles
The structures of the isomers and the m/z values of their peaks are not given in the question. The complete question is provided in the attachment
Answer:
Compound 2 (2,5-dimethylhexane) will not have the peaks at 29 and 85 m/z
Explanation:
The fragmentation of molecules by electron ionization of mass spectrometer occurs according to Stevenson's Rule, which states that "The most probable fragmentation is the one that leaves the positive charge on the fragment with the lowest ionization energy". This is much like the Markovnikov's Rule in organic chemistry which has predicted the formation of most stable carbocation and the addition of hydrogen halide to it.
The mass spectra of compound 1 (2,4-dimethylhexane) will contain all the m/z values mentioned in the question. Each peak indicate towards homologous series of fragmentation product of the compound 1. The first peak can be attributed to ethyl carbocation (m/z = 29), with the increase of 14 units the next peak indicates towards propyl carbocation (m/z = 43) and onwards until molecular ion peak of 114 m/z.
Compound 2 (2,5-dimethylhexane) structure shows that the cleavage of C-C bond will not yield a stable ethyl and hexyl carbocation. Hence, no peaks will be observed at 29 and 85 m/z. The absence of these two peaks can be used to distinguish one isomer from the other.
I believe that the answer is A) All Nitrogen atoms have 7 protons