Answer:
D) No, since kinetic energy is not conserved.
Explanation:
Since momentum is always conserved in all collision
so in Y direction we can say


Now similarly in X direction we will have


now final kinetic energy of both puck after collision is given as


initial kinetic energy of both pucks is given as


since KE is decreased here so it must be inelastic collision
D) No, since kinetic energy is not conserved.
Answer:
Explanation:
If Bradley examination was done and interpreted in the same facility, the radiologist code is used example- procedure code 72100- Radiologic examination, spine, lumbosacral, 2 or 3 views is reported.
if the X-ray was taken by Dr X but Dr X does not read or interpret the image but forward it to the radiologist for initial report, then a 26- modifier is used. E.g A reports by the technologist would be, procedure code 72050-Radiologic examination, spine, cervical, 2 or 3
views or 72050- TC in certain situations and the consulting radiologist would report 72050-26.
if Bradley’s x-ray were sent to an independent radiologist for interpretation, then the procedure code 76140 is used in reporting.
Answer with Explanation:
We are given that


Charge on proton,q=
a.We have to find the electric potential of the proton at the position of the electron.
We know that the electric potential

Where 


B.Potential energy of electron,U=
Where
Charge on electron
=Charge on proton
Using the formula


The mass of the puck is
m = 0.15 kg.
The diameter of the puck is 0.076 m, therefore its radius is
r = 0.076/2 = 0.038 m
The sliding speed is
v = 0.5 m/s
The angular velocity is
ω = 8.4 rad/s
The rotational moment of inertia of the puck is
I = (mr²)/2
= 0.5*(0.15 kg)*(0.038 m)²
= 1.083 x 10⁻⁴ kg-m²
The kinetic energy of the puck is the sum of the translational and rotational kinetic energy.
The translational KE is
KE₁ = (1/2)*m*v²
= 0.5*(0.15 kg)*(0.5 m/s)²
= 0.0187 j
The rotational KE is
KE₂ = (1/2)*I*ω²
= 0.5*(1.083 x 10⁻⁴ kg-m²)*(8.4 rad/s)²
= 0.0038 J
The total KE is
KE = 0.0187 + 0.0038 = 0.0226 J
Answer: 0.0226 J
Answer: It would increase.
Explanation:
The equation for determining the force of the gravitational pull between any two objects is:

Where G is the universal gravitational constant, m1 is the mass of one body, m2 is the mass of the other body, and r^2 is the distance between the two objects' centers squared.
Assuming the Earth's mass but not its diameter increased, in the equation above m1 (the term usually indicative of the object of larger mass) would increase, while the r^2 would not.
Thus, it goes without saying that, with some simple reasoning about fractions, an increasing numerator over a constant denominator would result in a larger number to multiply by G, thus also meaning a larger gravitational strength between Earth and whatever other object is of interest.