Answer:
the only effect it has is to create more induced charge at the closest points, but the net face remains zero, so it has no effect on the flow.
Explanation:
We can answer this exercise using Gauss's law
Ф = ∫ e . dA = 
/ ε₀
field flow is directly proportionate to the charge found inside it, therefore if we place a Gaussian surface outside the plastic spherical shell. the flow must be zero since the charge of the sphere is equal induced in the shell, for which the net charge is zero. we see with this analysis that this shell meets the requirement to block the elective field
From the same Gaussian law it follows that if the sphere is not in the center, the only effect it has is to create more induced charge at the closest points, but the net face remains zero, so it has no effect on the flow , so no matter where the sphere is, the total induced charge is always equal to the charge on the sphere.
There is no theory here.
Myron has offered one hypothesis to explain his observations.
There are other possible hypotheses.
They include:
-- An infected mosquito might have bitten him while he slept,
and the results of the infection might be starting to show up.
-- He might have eaten something for dinner last night
that was slightly spoiled.
-- He might have imbibed too much beer for his own good
at the fraternity party last night.
-- There may be too much Carbon Dioxide in the classroom air.
-- His body may be reacting to the physical stress of running to class.
So far, Myron only has a hypothesis.
He's in no position to come to any "conclusion" until he tests
his hypothesis, and shows that the same results follow the same
conditions MOST of the time. His hypothesis may be difficult to
test, but until he does that, he doesn't have a theory.
My personal opinion is that while his hypothesis may also be correct,
the most likely source of his observation is the recent physical stress
of running to class. It's important to understand that I'm in no position
to try and convince anyone of this conclusion. My opinion is simply
another hypothesis. It carries no weight until it's tested.
Answer:
T=C*P*V
Explanation:
It is said that a variable - let's call 'y' -, is proportional to another - let's call it 'x' - if x and y are multiplicatively connected to a constant 'C'. It means that their product (x*y) can be always equaled to the constant 'C' or their division (
) can be always equaled to 'C'. The first case is the case of the inverse proportionality: It is said that x and y are inversely proportional if
The second case is the case of the direct proportionality: It is said that x and y are directly proportional if
: x is directly proportional to y.
or
: y is directly proportional to x.
Always that any text does not specify about directly or inversely proportionality, it is assumed to mean directly automatically.
For our case, we are said that the temperature T is proportional to the pressure P and the volume V (we assume that it means directly); it is a double proportionality but follows the same rules:
If T were just proportional to P, we would have:
If T were just proportional to V, we would have:
As T is proportional to both P and V, the right equation is:
In order to isolate the temperature, let's multiply (P*V) at each side of the equation:
Answer:
<h2><em>V(water)= 237 mL=237×10^-6 m^3</em></h2><h2><em>ρ(water)=1000 kg/m^3</em></h2><h2><em>
m=</em><em>ρ×V=(1000)×(237×10^-6)</em></h2><h2><em>
m= 237×10^-3 = 0.237 kg</em></h2><h2><em>
m= 237 gram.</em></h2>
Potential energy at any point is (M G H). On the way down, only H changes. So halfway down, half of the potential energy remains, and the other half has turned to kinetic energy. Half of the (M G H) it had at the tpp is (0.5 x 9.8 x 10) = 49 joules.
