Answer:
velocity = 472 m/s
velocity = 52.4 m/s
Explanation:
given data
steady rate = 0.750 m³/s
diameter = 4.50 cm
solution
we use here flow rate formula that is
flow rate = Area × velocity .............1
0.750 = × (4.50×
)² × velocity
solve it we get
velocity = 472 m/s
and
when it 3 time diameter
put valuer in equation 1
0.750 = × 3 × (4.50×
)² × velocity
velocity = 52.4 m/s
1) At x = 6.6 cm,
2) At x = 6.6 cm,
3) At x = 1.45 cm,
4) At x = 1.45 cm,
5) Surface charge density at b = 4 cm:
6) At x = 3.34 cm, the x-component of the electric field is zero
7) Surface charge density at a = 2.9 cm:
8) None of these regions
Explanation:
1)
The electric field of an infinite sheet of charge is perpendicular to the sheet:
where
is the surface charge density
is the vacuum permittivity
The field produced by a thick slab, outside the slab itself, is the same as an infinite sheet.
So, the electric field at x = 6.6 cm (which is on the right of both the sheet and the slab) is the superposition of the fields produced by the sheet and by the slab:
where
The field of the sheet is to the left (negative charge, inward field), while the field of the slab is the right (positive charge, outward field).
So,
And the negative sign indicates that the direction is to the right.
2)
We note that the field produced both by the sheet and by the slab is perpendicular to the sheet and the slab: so it is directed along the x-direction (no component along the y-direction).
So the total field along the y-direction is zero.
This is a consequence of the fact that both the sheet and the slab are infinite along the y-axis. This means that if we take a random point along the x-axis, the y-component of the field generated by an element of surface dS of the sheet (or the slab), , is equal and opposite to the y-component of the field generated by an element of surface dS of the sheet located at exactly on the opposite side with respect to the x-axis,
. Therefore, the net field along the y-direction is always zero.
3)
Here it is similar to part 1), but this time the point is located at
x = 1.45 cm
so between the sheet and the slab. This means that both the fields of the sheet and of the slab are to the left, because the slab is negatively charged (so the field is outward). Therefore, the total field is
Substituting the same expressions of part 1), we find
where the negative sign indicates that the direction is to the left.
4)
This part is similar to part 2). Since the field is always perpendicular to the slab and the sheet, it has no component along the y-axis, therefore the y-component of the electric field is zero.
5)
Here we note that the slab is conductive: this means that the charges in the slab are free to move.
We note that the net charge on the slab is positive: this means that there is an excess of positive charge overall. Also, since the sheet (on the left of the slab) is negatively charged, the positive charges migrate to the left end of the slab (at a = 2.9 cm) while the negative charges migrate to the right end (at b = 4 cm).
The net charge per unit area of the slab is
And this the average of the surface charge density on both sides of the slab, a and b:
(1)
Also, the infinite sheet located at x = 0, which has a negative charge , induces an opposite net charge on the left surface of the slab, so
(2)
Now we have two equations (1) and (2), so we can solve to find the surface charge densities on a and b, and we find:
6)
Here we want to calculate the value of the x-component of the electric field at
x = 3.34 cm
We notice that this point is located inside the slab, because its edges are at
a = 2.9 cm
b = 4.0 cm
But slab is conducting , and the electric field inside a conductor is always zero (because the charges are in equilibrium): therefore, this means that the x-component of the electric field inside the slab is zero
7)
We calculated the value of the charge per unit area on the surface of the slab at x = a = 2.9 cm in part 5), and it is
8)
As we said in part 6), the electric field inside a conductor is always zero. Since the slab in this problem is conducting, this means that the electric field inside the slab is zero: therefore, the regions where the field is zero is
2.9 cm < x < 4 cm
So the correct answer is
"none of these region"
Learn more about electric fields:
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
8, 8 W
Explanation:
The useful power of 1 Light Emitting Diode is
Total power required is 1.6 W
Number of Light Emitting Diodes would be
The number of Light Emitting Diodes is 8.
Power would be
The power that is required to run the Light Emitting Diodes is 8 W
Answer: It would increase.
Explanation:
The equation for determining the force of the gravitational pull between any two objects is:
Where G is the universal gravitational constant, m1 is the mass of one body, m2 is the mass of the other body, and r^2 is the distance between the two objects' centers squared.
Assuming the Earth's mass but not its diameter increased, in the equation above m1 (the term usually indicative of the object of larger mass) would increase, while the r^2 would not.
Thus, it goes without saying that, with some simple reasoning about fractions, an increasing numerator over a constant denominator would result in a larger number to multiply by G, thus also meaning a larger gravitational strength between Earth and whatever other object is of interest.