Answer is: 31,45%.
mrs₁(C₉H₁₆O₄-<span>azelaic acid) = 12g.
mr</span>₂(C₉H₁₆O₄) = 50g.
ω₂(C₉H₁₆O₄) = 15% = 0,15.
mrs₂(C₉H₁₆O₄) = mr₂·ω₂ = 50g·0,15 = 7,5g.
mrs₃(C₉H₁₆O₄) = mrs₁ + mr₂ = 12g + 7,5g = 19,5g.
mr₃ = mr₂ + mr₂ = 50g + 12g = 62g.
ω₃ = mrs₃÷mr₃ = 19,5g ÷ 62g = 31,45% = 0,3145.
Answer:
The empirical formula of this substance is:

Explanation:
To find the empirical formula of this substance we need the molecular weight of the elements Carbon, Hydrogen and Oxygen, we can find this information in the periodic table:
- C: 12.01 g/mol
- H: 1.00 g/mol
- O: 15.99 g/mol
With the information in this exercise we can suppose in 100 g of the substance we have:
C: 48.64 g
H: 8.16 g
O: 43.2 g (100 g - 48.64g - 8.16g= 43.2 g)
Now, we need to divide these grams by the molecular weight:

We need to divide these results by the minor result, in this case O=2.70 mol

We need to find integer numbers to find the empirical formula, for this reason we multiply by 2:

This numbers are very close to integer numbers, so we can find the empirical formula as subscripts in the chemical formula:

Answer is: D. It is not sodium bicarbonate.
Balanced chemical reaction of heating sodium bicarbonate: 2NaHCO₃ → Na₂CO₃ + CO₂ + H₂O.
This is chemical change (chemical reaction), because new substances are formed (sodium carbonate, carbon(IV) oxide and water), the atoms are rearranged, so there is no sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO₃) in the test tube.
Hello there!
Your question is asking: <span>Which environmental factor could lead to a decrease in genetic variation in a population of tuna?
The correct answer is B. An increase in pollution </span>