answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IrinaVladis [17]
2 years ago
12

How many top quark lifetimes have there been in the history of the universe (i.e., what is the age of the universe divided by th

e lifetime of a top quark)? Note that these powers of 10 follow the same rules that any exponents would follow.
(The age of the universe is around 100,000,000,000,000,000s. A top quark has a lifetime of roughly 0.000000000000000000000001s. Writing numbers out with all these zeros is not very convenient. Such quantities are usually written as powers of 10. The age of the universe can be written as 1017s and the lifetime of a top quark as 10−24s.
Note that1017 means the number you would get by multiplying 10 times 10 times 10... a total of 17 times. This number, as you can see above, would be a one followed by seventeen zeros. Similarly, 10−24 is the result of multiplying 0.1 (or 1/10) times itself 24 times. As seen above, this is written as 23 zeros after the decimal point followed by a one.)
Physics
1 answer:
ololo11 [35]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

1.0\cdot 10^{41} times

Explanation:

First of all, we need to write both the age of the universe and the lifetime of the top quark in scientific notation.

Age of the universe:

T=100,000,000,000,000,000s = 1.0\cdot 10^{17} s (1 followed by 17 zeroes)

Lifetime of the top quark:

\tau = 0.000000000000000000000001s = 1.0\cdot 10^{-24} s (we moved the decimal point 24 places to the right)

Therefore, to answer the question, we have to calculate the ratio between the age of the universe and the lifetime of the top quark:

r = \frac{T}{\tau}=\frac{1.0\cdot 10^{17} s}{1.0\cdot 10^{-24} s}=1.0\cdot 10^{41}

You might be interested in
The length of a wire 2.00 m is measured as 2.02m. What is the percentage error in the measurement?
n200080 [17]

Answer:

1%

Explanation:

Percent error can be found by dividing the absolute error (difference between measure and actual value) by the actual value, then multiplying by 100.

Percent Error=\frac{V_{measured}- V_{true} } {V_{true}} *100

The measured value is 2.02 meters and the actual value is 2.00 meters.

V_{measured}=2.02\\\\V_{true}=2.00

Percent Error=\frac{2.02-2.00}{2.00} *100

First, evaluate the fraction. Subtract 2.00 from 2.02

Percent Error=\frac{0.02}{2.00}*100

Next, divide 0.02 by 2.00

PercentError=0.01 *100

Finally, multiply 0.01 and 100.

Percent  Error=1\\Percent  Error= 1 \%

The percent error is 1%.

6 0
2 years ago
f a car is speeding down a road at 40 miles/hour (mph), how long is the stopping distance D40 compared to the stopping distance
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

D40 = 2.56 × D25

so number is 2.56 multiple of stopping distance @ 25 mph

Explanation:

given data

speed = 40 miles / hour

distance = D40

speed limit = 25 miles / hour

distance = D25

to find out

express number a multiple of stopping distance @ 25 mph

solution

we know here stopping distance is directly proportional to (speed)²

so here speed ratio is

initial speed = \frac{40}{25}

so initial speed = 1.6

so

stopping distance increase = (1.6)²

\frac{D40}{D25} = (1.6)²

\frac{D40}{D25} = 2.56

so here

D40 = 2.56 × D25

so number is 2.56 multiple of stopping distance @ 25 mph

5 0
2 years ago
100 POINTS! I will mark brainliest! Record your hypothesis as an “if, then” statement for the rate of dissolving the compounds:
love history [14]

Answer:

<u><em>Rate of dissolving compounds:</em></u>

If we increase the temperature of the solution, then the dissolving compound would dissolve more easily.

<u><em>Boiling Point of Compounds:</em></u>

If the inter-molecular forces of any compound is really strong, then the boiling point of the compound would be really high.

6 0
2 years ago
An x-ray tube is an evacuated glass tube that produces electrons at one end and then accelerates them to very high speeds by the
laila [671]

Answer:

a)  V = 1.866 10² V ,  b)   V = 3.424 10⁵ V , c)   v = 8.1 10⁶ m / s

Explanation:

a) the potential difference is requested to accelerate the electrons up to 2.7% of the speed of light

           v = 0.027 c

           v = 0.027 3 10⁸

           v = 8.1 10⁶ m / s

for this part we can use the conservation of mechanical energy

starting point. When electrons are at rest

           Em₀ = U = q V

final point. Electrons with maximum speed

          Em_f = K = ½ m v2

          Em₀ = Em_{f}

          e V = ½ m v²

          V = ½ m v² / e

let's calculate

          V = ½  9.1 10⁻³¹ (8.1 10⁶)² / 1.6 10⁻¹⁹

          V = 1.866 10² V

           V = 1866 V

         

b) if this acceleration protons is the mass of the proton is m_{p} = 1.67 10-27

          V = ½ 1.67 10⁻²⁷ (8.1 10⁶)² / 1.6 10⁻¹⁹

           V = 3.424 10⁵ V

           V = 342402 V

c)   this potential difference should give the protons the same speed as the electrons

             v = 8.1 10⁶ m / s

5 0
2 years ago
Light with a wavelength of 495 nm is falling on a surface and electrons with a maximum kinetic energy of 0.5 eV are ejected. Wha
devlian [24]

Answer:

To increase the maximum kinetic energy of electrons to 1.5 eV, it is necessary that ultraviolet radiation of 354 nm falls on the surface.

Explanation:

First, we have to calculate the work function of the element. The maximum kinetic energy as a function of the wavelength is given by:

K_{max}=\frac{hc}{\lambda}-W

Here h is the Planck's constant, c is the speed of light, \lambda is the wavelength of the light and W the work function of the element:

W=\frac{hc}{\lambda}-K_{max}\\W=\frac{(4.14*10^{-15}eV\cdot s)(3*10^8\frac{m}{s})}{495*10^{-9}m}-0.5eV\\W=2.01eV

Now, we calculate the wavelength for the new maximum kinetic energy:

W+K_{max}=\frac{hc}{\lambda}\\\lambda=\frac{hc}{W+K_{max}}\\\lambda=\frac{(4.14*10^{-15}eV\cdot s)(3*10^8\frac{m}{s})}{2.01eV+1.5eV}\\\lambda=3.54*10^{-7}m=354*10^{-9}m=354nm

This wavelength corresponds to ultraviolet radiation. So, to increase the maximum kinetic energy of electrons to 1.5 eV, it is necessary that ultraviolet radiation of 354 nm falls on the surface.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Whenever important physicists are discussed, Galileo Galilei, Isaac Newton, and Albert Einstein seem get the most attention. How
    13·1 answer
  • A quarterback throws a football with an initial velocity v at an angle θ above horizontal. Assume the ball leaves the quarterbac
    14·1 answer
  • Large-scale environmental catastrophes _______.
    13·1 answer
  • a pebble is dropped down a well and hits the water 1.5 seconds later. using the equations for motion with constant acceleration,
    7·2 answers
  • Takumi works in his yard for 45 minutes each Saturday. He works in the morning, and he wears sunscreen and a hat each time he wo
    12·2 answers
  • Integrated Concepts A basketball player jumps straight up for a ball. To do this, he lowers his body 0.300 m and then accelerate
    9·1 answer
  • Anjali's plane had been flying through calm skies (no wind) with a velocity (speed and direction) vector <img src="https://tex.z
    11·1 answer
  • An astronaut on a space walk floats a little too far away
    5·2 answers
  • 1. Describe the methods by which an electric potential develops in primary cells and dry cells.
    13·1 answer
  • A rabbit is trying to cross the street. Its velocity v as a function of time t is given in the graph below where
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!