Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

5

If a rock is thrown upward on the planet Mars with a velocity of 18 m/s, its height (in meters) after t seconds is given by H =

18t − 1.86t2. (a) Find the velocity of the rock after one second. 14.28 Correct: Your answer is correct. m/s (b) Find the velocity of the rock when t = a. Correct: Your answer is correct. m/s (c) When will the rock hit the surface? (Round your answer to one decimal place.) t = Incorrect: Your answer is incorrect. s (d) With what velocity will the rock hit the surface? m/s

1 answer:

lukranit [14]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

a) The velocity of the rock after 1 s is 14.28 m/s.

b) The velocity of the rock after "a" seconds is 18 m/s - 3.72 m/s² · a

c) The rock will hit the ground after 9.7 s.

d) The velocity with which the rock hits the surface is -18.1 m/s

Explanation:

Hi there!

Let´s write the equation:

H(t) = 18 m/s · t - 1.86 m/s² · t²

The velocity is the variaiton of the height over time, in other words, it is the derivative of the height function with respect to time. Then:

v(t) = dH/dt = 18 m/s - 2 · 1.86 m/s² · t

v(t) = 18 m/s - 3.72 m/s² · t

a) When t = 1 s:

v(1 s) = 18 m/s - 3.72 m/s² · 1 s

v(1 s) = 14.28 m/s

b) When t = a:

v(a) = 18 m/s - 3.72 m/s² · a

c) When the rock hits the surface, the height of the rock is 0:

H(t) = 18 m/s · t - 1.86 m/s² · t²

0 = 18 m/s · t - 1.86 m/s² · t²

0 = t(18 m/s - 1.86 m/s² · t)

t = 0

and

18 m/s - 1.86 m/s² · t = 0

t = -18 m/s /- 1.86 m/s²

t = 9.7 s

d) Let´s use the equation of velocity to find the velocity at t = 9.7 s when the rock hits the ground.

v(t) = 18 m/s - 3.72 m/s² · t

v(9.7 s) = 18 m/s - 3.72 m/s² · 9.7 s

v(9.7 s) = -18.1 m/s

You might be interested in

An infinite sheet of charge, oriented perpendicular to the x-axis, passes through x = 0. It has a surface charge density σ1 = -2

docker41 [41]

1) At x = 6.6 cm, $E_x=3.47\cdot 10^6 N/C$

2) At x = 6.6 cm, $E_y=0$

3) At x = 1.45 cm, $E_x=-3.76\cdot 10^6N/C$

4) At x = 1.45 cm, $E_y=0$

5) Surface charge density at b = 4 cm: $+62.75 \mu C/m^2$

6) At x = 3.34 cm, the x-component of the electric field is zero

7) Surface charge density at a = 2.9 cm: $+65.25 \mu C/m^2$

8) None of these regions

Explanation:

1)

The electric field of an infinite sheet of charge is perpendicular to the sheet:

$E=\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}$

where

$\sigma$ is the surface charge density

$\epsilon_0=8.85\cdot 10^{-12}F/m$ is the vacuum permittivity

The field produced by a thick slab, outside the slab itself, is the same as an infinite sheet.

So, the electric field at x = 6.6 cm (which is on the right of both the sheet and the slab) is the superposition of the fields produced by the sheet and by the slab:

$E=E_1+E_2=\frac{\sigma_1}{2\epsilon_0}+\frac{\sigma_2}{2\epsilon_0}$

where

$\sigma_1=-2.5\mu C/m^2 = -2.5\cdot 10^{-6}C/m^2\\\sigma_2=64 \muC/m^2 = 64\cdot 10^{-6}C/m^2$

The field of the sheet is to the left (negative charge, inward field), while the field of the slab is the right (positive charge, outward field).

So,

$E=\frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\sigma_1+\sigma_2)=\frac{1}{2(8.85\cdot 10^{-12})}(-2.5\cdot 10^{-6}+64\cdot 10^{-6})=3.47\cdot 10^6 N/C$

And the negative sign indicates that the direction is to the right.

2)

We note that the field produced both by the sheet and by the slab is perpendicular to the sheet and the slab: so it is directed along the x-direction (no component along the y-direction).

So the total field along the y-direction is zero.

This is a consequence of the fact that both the sheet and the slab are infinite along the y-axis. This means that if we take a random point along the x-axis, the y-component of the field generated by an element of surface dS of the sheet (or the slab), $dE_y$ , is equal and opposite to the y-component of the field generated by an element of surface dS of the sheet located at exactly on the opposite side with respect to the x-axis, $-dE_y$ . Therefore, the net field along the y-direction is always zero.

3)

Here it is similar to part 1), but this time the point is located at

x = 1.45 cm

so between the sheet and the slab. This means that both the fields of the sheet and of the slab are to the left, because the slab is negatively charged (so the field is outward). Therefore, the total field is

$E=E_1-E_2$

Substituting the same expressions of part 1), we find

$E=\frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\sigma_1-\sigma_2)=\frac{1}{2(8.85\cdot 10^{-12})}(-2.5\cdot 10^{-6}-64\cdot 10^{-6})=-3.76\cdot 10^6N/C$

where the negative sign indicates that the direction is to the left.

4)

This part is similar to part 2). Since the field is always perpendicular to the slab and the sheet, it has no component along the y-axis, therefore the y-component of the electric field is zero.

5)

Here we note that the slab is conductive: this means that the charges in the slab are free to move.

We note that the net charge on the slab is positive: this means that there is an excess of positive charge overall. Also, since the sheet (on the left of the slab) is negatively charged, the positive charges migrate to the left end of the slab (at a = 2.9 cm) while the negative charges migrate to the right end (at b = 4 cm).

The net charge per unit area of the slab is

$\sigma=+64\mu C/m^2$

And this the average of the surface charge density on both sides of the slab, a and b:

$\sigma=\frac{\sigma_a+\sigma_b}{2}$ (1)

Also, the infinite sheet located at x = 0, which has a negative charge $\sigma_1=-2.5\mu C/m^2$ , induces an opposite net charge on the left surface of the slab, so

$\sigma_a-\sigma_b = +2.5 \mu C/m^2$ (2)

Now we have two equations (1) and (2), so we can solve to find the surface charge densities on a and b, and we find:

$\sigma_a = +65.25 \mu C/m^2\\\sigma_b = +62.75 \mu C/m^2$

6)

Here we want to calculate the value of the x-component of the electric field at

x = 3.34 cm

We notice that this point is located inside the slab, because its edges are at

a = 2.9 cm

b = 4.0 cm

But slab is conducting , and the electric field inside a conductor is always zero (because the charges are in equilibrium): therefore, this means that the x-component of the electric field inside the slab is zero

7)

We calculated the value of the charge per unit area on the surface of the slab at x = a = 2.9 cm in part 5), and it is $\sigma_a = +65.25 \mu C/m^2$

8)

As we said in part 6), the electric field inside a conductor is always zero. Since the slab in this problem is conducting, this means that the electric field inside the slab is zero: therefore, the regions where the field is zero is

2.9 cm < x < 4 cm

So the correct answer is

"none of these region"

Learn more about electric fields:

brainly.com/question/8960054

brainly.com/question/4273177

#LearnwithBrainly

8 0

2 years ago

Samantha wants her friend to wear a bicycle helmet when they go cycling. She wants to explain how a bicycle is designed to provi

givi [52]

If you don't wear a helmet and let's say you fell off your bike, you can severely injure your head! But if you DO wear a helmet and you fell off your bike, there's about I predict a 98% chance that you won't injure but sometimes it's 100%

hope this helps!<span />

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Alex throws a 0.15-kg rubber ball down onto the floor. The ball’s speed just before impact is 6.5 m/s, and just after is 3.5 m/s

Jet001 [13]

Answer: Change in ball's momentum is 1.5 kg-m/s.

Explanation: It is given that,

Mass of the ball, m = 0.15 kg

Speed before the impact, u = 6.5 m/s

Speed after the impact, v = -3.5 m/s (as it will rebound)

We need to find the change in the magnitude of the ball's momentum. It is given by :

So, the change in the ball's momentum is 1.5 kg-m/s. Hence, this is the required solution.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/12946012#readmore

7 0

1 year ago

7) Three resistors having resistances of 4.0 Ω, 6.0 Ω, and 10.0 Ω are connected in parallel. If the combination is connected in

viva [34]

Answer:

A, 0.59A

Explanation:

The total resistance in the circuit is the resistances in parallel plus that in series.

Total resistance for those in parallel is;

1/(1/4 +1/6 +1/10) = 1/ (15+10+6 /60)

1/(31/60)= 60/31 ohms

Hence total resistance of the circuit is;

60/31 + 2 = (60+62)/31 = 122/31=3.94 ohms

To calculate the current flowing through the 10ohm resistance we need to know the voltage drop by subtracting the voltage drop in the 2ohm resistance from the total voltage drop.

Voltage drop on the 2 ohm resistance is;

Current on the 2 ohm resistor × 2 ohms

V = I ×R ; I - current

R - resistance

Current drop on the 2ohm resistance is;

Total voltage in the circuit/ total resistance in the circuit

12/3.94= 3.05A

Voltage drop on the 2 ohm resistance;

3.05 × 2 = 6.10volts

Hence voltage drop on the parallel resistance would be ;

12-6.10= 5.90V

Now voltage drop in a parallel circuit is the same hence 5.90v is dropped in each of the parallel resistance.

That said, the current drop on the 10 ohm resistor would be;

5.90/10 = 0.59A

Remember V= I× R so that I = V/R

6 0

2 years ago

Often what one expects to see influences what is perceived in the surrounding environment. Please select the best answer from th

Stella [2.4K]

Hello <span>Andijwiltbank
</span>

Question: <span>Often what one expects to see influences what is perceived in the surrounding environment. True or False?

Answer: True

Reason: What we observe about the environment decides what we believe about it and how we react.

Hope This Helps :-)
-Chris</span>

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers