Transverse waves travel on a direction that is perpendicular to the motion of the particles (or whatever medium is waving) So the particles must be moving east to west, which is transverse to the north-south motion of the wave
They are both right because you can note both things, I mean Raphael and Lucinda, both has a right statement or explanation about the wave. Wave by nothing is both for its wavelength and for its frequency. So Raphael and Lucinda are both correct because you can note both wavelength and frequency.
Since the bulb consumes 100 watts of power and its efficiency is 95%,
it generates 95 watts of light energy and 5 watts of heat energy whenever
it's turned on.
5 watts means 5 joules of energy per second.
(2.5 hours) x (3,600 seconds/hour) = 9,000 seconds
(9,000 seconds) x (5 joules/second) = 45,000 joules of heat in 2.5 hours
From tables,
SVP at 30°C = 4.24 kPa
From ideal gas expressions;
n = PV/RT = (4.24*1000*450)/(8.314*303) = 757.4 moles
Now, 75% of 757.4 moles will evaporate leaving 20%. Then, 25% of 757.5 moles...
25% of 757.4 moles = 25/100*757.4 = 189.35 moles
Mass of 189.35 moles = 189.35 moles*18 g/mol = 3408.3 g ≈ 3.4 kg
