If no frictional work is considered, then the energy of the system (the driver at all positions is conserved.
Let
position 1 = initial height of the diver (h₁), together with the initial velocity (v₁).
position 2 = final height of the diver (h₂) and the final velocity (v₂).
The initial PE = mgh₁ and the initial KE = (1/2)mv₁²
where g = acceleration due to gravity,
m = mass of the diver.
Similarly, the final PE and KE are respectively mgh₂ and (1/2)mv₂².
PE in position 1 is converted into KE due to the loss in height from position 1 to position 2.
Therefore
(KE + PE) ₁ = (KE + PE)₂
Evaluate the given answers.
A) The total mechanical energy of the system increases.
FALSE
B) Potential energy can be converted into kinetic energy but not vice versa.
TRUE
C) (KE + PE)beginning = (KE + PE) end.
TRUE
D) All of the above.
FALSE
Answer:

Explanation:
Given that,
Initial speed, u = 5 m/s
Final speed, v = 10 m/s
Time, t = 2 s
The radius of the tire of the bike, r = 35 cm
We need to find the angular acceleration of the pebble during those two seconds. It can be calculated as follows.

So, the required angular acceleration of the pebble is equal to
.
Answer:
E. downward and constant
Explanation:
Freefall is a special case of motion with constant acceleration because the acceleration due to gravity is always constant and downward. This is true even when an object is thrown upward or has zero velocity.
For example, when a ball is thrown up in the air, the ball's velocity is initially upward. Since gravity pulls the object toward the earth with a constant acceleration ggg, the magnitude of velocity decreases as the ball approaches maximum height. At the highest point in its trajectory, the ball has zero velocity, and the magnitude of velocity increases again as the ball falls back toward the earth.
Newton's second law ...Force = momentum change/time.momentum change = Forcextme.also, F=ma -> a=F/m - the more familiar form of Newton's second law
using one of the kinematic equations for m ... V=u+at; u=0; a=F/m -> V=(F/m)xt.-> t=mV/F using one of the kinematic equations for 2m ... V=u+at; u=0; a=F/2m -> V=(F/2m)xt. -> t=2mV/F (twice as long, maybe ?)
I think I've made a mistake somewhere below, but I think that the principle is right ...using one of the kinematic equations for m ... s=ut + (1/2)at^2); s=d;u=0;a=F/m; t=1; -> d=(1/2)(F/m)=F/2musing one of the kinematic equations for 2m ... s=ut + (1/2)at^2); s=d;u=0;a=F/2m; t=1; -> d=(1/2)(F/2m)=F/4m (half as far ????? WHAT ???)
When the relationship between two variables are said to be proportional, it means that one variable is a constant multiple of the other variable. They are related by a constant of proportionality, usually denoted as k.
In this problem, the dependent variable is the distance in kilometers. Your mileage is limited with the amount of fuel you have. Thus, the independent variable is the liters of fuel. When these two are proportional, it could be expressed as
distance = k * liters of fuel, such that
distance/liters of fuel = k
By variation,
distance,1/liters of fuel,1 = distance,2/liters of fuel,2, where 1 denotes situation 1 and 2 denotes situation 2. Therefore,
999999 km /<span>999 liters = x km /</span><span>121212 liters, where x is the unknown distance. We can now therefore find the value of x.
x = (999999*121212)/999
x = 121333212 kilometers</span>