All categories

2 years ago

Which of the following statements is false?

Physics

2 answers:

agasfer [191]2 years ago

6 0

A & B

Observe the path of the light ray as it passes through the lenses as shown in the attached images. Concave lenses diverge light rays while the convex lens converges the light rays.

Explanation:

Real images are formed where the rays converge, a property of images by convex lenses. Convex lenses can be used to magnify objects. If the image occurs before the focal point of the lens then the image will be upright but smaller. The images inverts and gets bigger past the focal point.

Virtual images are property of concave lenses. These images appear closer but smaller than the real object.

Learn More:

For more on images formed by lenses check out;

brainly.com/question/6722295

brainly.com/question/12191285

brainly.com/question/12529812

brainly.com/question/11788630

#LearnWithBrainly

N76 [4]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

C. Convex lenses always produce images that are inverted.

my tiktok channel

s344d

You might be interested in

The wheels of the locomotive push back on the tracks with a constant net force of 7.50 × 105 N, so the tracks push forward on th

Rasek [7]

Answer:

The freight train would take 542.265 second to increase the speed of the train from rest to 80.0 kilometers per hour.

Explanation:

Statement is incomplete. Complete description is presented below:

A freight train has a mass of $1.83\times 10^{7}\,kg$ . The wheels of the locomotive push back on the tracks with a constant net force of $7.50\times 10^{5}\,N$ , so the tracks push forward on the locomotive with a force of the same magnitude. Ignore aerodynamics and friction on the other wheels of the train. How long, in seconds, would it take to increase the speed of the train from rest to 80.0 kilometers per hour?

If locomotive have a constant net force ( $F$ ), measured in newtons, then acceleration ( $a$ ), measured in meters per square second, must be constant and can be found by the following expression:

$a = \frac{F}{m}$ (1)

Where $m$ is the mass of the freight train, measured in kilograms.

If we know that $F = 7.50\times 10^{5}\,N$ and $m = 1.83\times 10^{7}\,kg$ , then the acceleration experimented by the train is:

$a = \frac{7.50\times 10^{5}\,N}{1.83\times 10^{7}\,kg}$

$a = 4.098\times 10^{-2}\,\frac{m}{s^{2}}$

Now, the time taken to accelerate the freight train from rest ( $t$ ), measured in seconds, is determined by the following formula:

$t = \frac{v-v_{o}}{a}$ (2)

Where:

$v$ - Final speed of the train, measured in meters per second.

$v_{o}$ - Initial speed of the train, measured in meters per second.

If we know that $a = 4.098\times 10^{-2}\,\frac{m}{s^{2}}$ , $v_{o} = 0\,\frac{m}{s}$ and $v = 22.222\,\frac{m}{s}$ , the time taken by the freight train is:

$t = \frac{22.222\,\frac{m}{s}-0\,\frac{m}{s} }{4.098\times 10^{-2}\,\frac{m}{s^{2}} }$

$t = 542.265\,s$

The freight train would take 542.265 second to increase the speed of the train from rest to 80.0 kilometers per hour.

6 0

2 years ago

You are riding on a roller coaster that starts from rest at a height of 25.0 m and moves along a frictionless track. however, af

djyliett [7]

I attached the missing picture.
We can figure this one out using the law of conservation of energy.
At point A the car would have potential energy and kinetic energy.
$A: mgh_1+\frac{mv_1^2}{2}$
Then, while the car is traveling down the track it loses some of its initial energy due to friction:
$W_f=F_f\cdot L$
So, we know that the car is approaching the point B with the following amount of energy:
$mgh_1+\frac{mv_1^2}{2}- F_fL$
The law of conservation of energy tells us that this energy must the same as the energy at point B.
The energy at point B is the sum of car's kinetic and potential energy:
$B: mgh_2+\frac{mv_2}{2}$
As said before this energy must be the same as the energy of a car approaching the loop:
$mgh_2+\frac{mv_2}{2}=mgh_1+\frac{mv_1^2}{2}- F_fL$
Now we solve the equation for $v_1$ :
$v_1^2=2g(h_2-h_1)+v_2^2+\frac{2F_fL}{m}\\
v_1^2=39.23\\
v_1=\sqrt{39.23}=6.26\frac{m}{s}$

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Dylan has two cubes of iron. The larger cube has twice the mass of the smaller cube. He measures the smaller cube. Its mass is 2

liubo4ka [24]

Answer:

The volume of the larger cube is 5.08 g/cm³.

Explanation:

Given that,

Mass of smaller cube = 20 g

Density of smaller cube $\rho= 7.87 g/cm^2$

Dylan has two cubes of iron.

The larger cube has twice the mass of the smaller cube.

$M_{l}=2m_{s}$

Density is same for both cubes because both cubes are same material.

The density is equal to the mass divided by the volume.

$\rho=\dfrac{m}{V}$

$V=\dfrac{m}{\rho}$

Where, V = volume

m = mass

$\rho=density$

We need to calculate the volume of smaller mass

The volume of smaller mass

$V_{s}=\dfrac{m_{s}}{\rho_{s}}$

$V_{s}=\dfrac{20}{7.87}$

$V_{s}=2.54\ cm^3$

Now, We need to calculate the volume of large cube

$V_{l}=\dfrac{m_{l}}{\rho_{l}}$

$V_{l}=\dfrac{2\times20}{7.87}$

$V_{l}=5.08\ g/cm^3$

Hence, The volume of the larger cube is 5.08 g/cm³.

8 0

2 years ago

Sharks are generally negatively buoyant; the upward buoyant force is less than the weight force. This is one reason sharks tend

Tresset [83]

Answer:

8.67807 N

34.7123 N

Explanation:

m = Mass of shark = 92 kg

$\rho_{se}$ = Density of seawater = 1030 kg/m³

$\rho_{f}$ = Density of freshwater = 1000 kg/m³

$\rho_{sh}$ = Density of shark = 1040 kg/m³

g = Acceleration due to gravity = 9.81 m/s²

Net force on the fin is (seawater)

$F_n=mg-V_s\rho_{se}g\\\Rightarrow F_n=mg-\frac{m}{\rho_{sh}}\rho_{se}g\\\Rightarrow F_n=92\times 9.81-\frac{92}{1040}\times 1030\times 9.81\\\Rightarrow F_n=8.67807\ N$

The lift force required in seawater is 8.67807 N

Net force on the fin is (freshwater)

$F_n=mg-V_s\rho_{f}g\\\Rightarrow F_n=mg-\frac{m}{\rho_{sh}}\rho_{f}g\\\Rightarrow F_n=92\times 9.81-\frac{92}{1040}\times 1000\times 9.81\\\Rightarrow F_n=34.7123\ N$

The lift force required in a river is 34.7123 N

6 0

2 years ago

The price of coffee fell sharply last month, while the quantity sold remained the same. Five people suggest various explanations

miss Akunina [59]

Answer:

France. True Supply increased and demand did not adapt

Explanation:

If the price of coffee decreases it may be due to two causes

- Increase of the offer

- decrease in demand

- both simultaneously.

Let's examine the statement. They tell us that the amount sold remained constant, so there is no decrease in demand, therefore the only cause may be the increase in supply.

Let's check the answers

Antonio False. The demand is constant.

Carolina. False. The demand is constant.

Dmitri False. The demand is constant.

France. True Supply increased and demand did not adapt

Jake. False. Demand did not adapt to the increase in supply

7 0

2 years ago