Answer and Explanation:
<em>A funnel is in the top of the buret and a beaker is positioned underneath the buret:</em> This is correct and is necessary to fill the buret, but the funnel and the beaker has to be removed before the titration starts. The calculation for moles of analyte does not affect.
<em>A solution is being poured from a bottle into the buret via the funnel:</em> Using a funnel helps to fill the burette but it must be removed to filling the buret at 0.0 mL. In this case, the calculation for moles of analyte do not affect.
<em>Adding titrant past the color change of the analyte solution</em>: In this case, an excess of titrant is added, thus the calculation for moles of anality will be higher than it should be.
<em>Recording the molarity of titrant as 0.1 M rather than its actual value of 0.01 M</em>: In this case, the titrant is considered more concentrated than it is hence, the calculation for moles of anality will be higher than it should be.
<em>Spilling some analyte out of the flask during the titration</em>: The excess of titrant spilled out of the flask higher up the volume of titrant measured. Therefore, the calculation for moles of anality will be higher than it should be.
<em>Starting the titration with air bubbles in the buret</em>: The air inside the burette occupies measured volume, thus the volume of titrant measured will be higher than the real volume spilled in the flask. Hence the calculation for moles of anality will be higher than it should be.
<em>Filling the buret above the 0.0 mL volume mark</em>: Some volume of titrant will be spilled inside the flask but will no be measured since the buret measures the titrant below the 0.0mL mark, thus the calculation for moles of anality will be lower than it should be.
Answer:
40% of the ammonia will take 4.97x10^-5 s to react.
Explanation:
The rate is equal to:
R = k*[NH3]*[HOCl] = 5.1x10^6 * [NH3] * 2x10^-3 = 10200 s^-1 * [NH3]
R = k´ * [NH3]
k´ = 10200 s^-1
Because k´ is the psuedo first-order rate constant, we have the following:
b/(b-x) = 100/(100-40) ; 40% ammonia reacts
b/(b-x) = 1.67
log(b/(b-x)) = log(1.67)
log(b/(b-x)) = 0.22
the time will equal to:
t = (2.303/k) * log(b/(b-x)) = (2.303/10200) * (0.22) = 4.97x10^-5 s
Answer:
Approximately 0.36 grams, because copper (II) chloride acts as a limiting reactant.
Explanation:
- It is a stichiometry problem.
- We should write the balance equation of the mentioned chemical reaction:
<em>2Al + 3CuCl₂ → 3Cu + 2AlCl₃.</em>
- It is clear that 2.0 moles of Al foil reacts with 3.0 moles of CuCl₂ to produce 3.0 moles of Cu metal and 2.0 moles of AlCl₃.
- Also, we need to calculate the number of moles of the reported masses of Al foil (0.50 g) and CuCl₂ (0.75 g) using the relation:
<em>n = mass / molar mass</em>
- The no. of moles of Al foil = mass / atomic mass = (0.50 g) / (26.98 g/mol) = 0.0185 mol.
- The no. of moles of CuCl₂ = mass / molar mass = (0.75 g) / (134.45 g/mol) = 5.578 x 10⁻³ mol.
- <em>From the stichiometry Al foil reacts with CuCl₂ with a ratio of 2:3.</em>
∴ 3.85 x 10⁻³ mol of Al foil reacts completely with 5.578 x 10⁻³ mol of CuCl₂ with <em>(2:3)</em> ratio and CuCl₂ is the limiting reactant while Al foil is in excess.
- From the stichiometry 3.0 moles of CuCl₂ will produce the same no. of moles of copper metal (3.0 moles).
- So, this reaction will produce 5.578 x 10⁻³ mol of copper metal.
- Finally, we can calculate the mass of copper produced using:
mass of Cu = no. of moles x Atomic mass of Cu = (5.578 x 10⁻³ mol)(63.546 g/mol) = 0.354459 g ≅ 0.36 g.
- <u><em>So, the answer is:</em></u>
<em>Approximately 0.36 grams, because copper (II) chloride acts as a limiting reactant.</em>
NH4I (aq) + KOH (aq) in chemical equation gives
NH4I (aq) + KOH (aq) = KI (aq) + H2O(l) + NH3 (l)
Ki is in aqueous state H2o is in liquid state while NH3 is in liquid state
from the equation above 1 mole of NH4I (aq) react with 1 mole of KOH(aq) to form 1mole of KI(aq) , 1mole of H2O(l) and 1 Mole of NH3(l)
thanks for the answers ッ. (btw they’re on the bottom of the question if anyone doesn’t see it.